• brucethemoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    72
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    I think there’s also a “Netflix effect” where old games are incresingly accessible as an alternative to newer crap, kinda like (from my personal observations) how a lot of young people seem to be really fluent in old movies and TV due to streaming and YT.

    Its going to bite these publishers in the bum.

    • stardust@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      1 month ago

      Indies I think helped younger gamers and old gamers become less impressed by graphics compared to the past. Gamers expect more and there’s many indies and old games people haven’t played.

      • slaacaa@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        1 month ago

        There is also just tiny graphic improvements now, so for most people, 5 years old games look similar to what we have now

          • ignism@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 month ago

            The remasters coming out now is such bullshit, I mean Horizon Zero Down… are you kidding me?

            • TachyonTele@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              I was playing the original not too long ago, and they freaking “updated” it with ai upscaling. It looks like absolute trash. I couldn’t figure out how to get rid of it.
              Why would you do that and also remaster it?

        • T156@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 month ago

          And that the requirements for those minimal improvements are vast. If you need to pull down 200GB for a minor graphical upgrade, that’s just not really worth it compared to an older game that is a bit graphically worse, but is both smaller, and runs better on newer hardware.

        • Cossty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 month ago

          I would even go lower than that. If you showed me Prey 2017 or even Alien Isolation 2014, and told me they came out today. I would probably believe you.

        • taladar@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          You can sort of tell by the whole 4k (or even 8k), 144Hz stuff that opportunities for real improvements have been running out for a while.

            • taladar@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 month ago

              Which is why they were ignored for a decade or two despite game engines easily achieving those FPS numbers and were pulled out exactly when the hardware vendors ran out of any other arguments to convince people to replace their existing screens and GPUs?

              • ampersandrew@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 month ago

                Maybe you’re only seeing the marketing now, probably because the customer base that would care about it are finally in large enough numbers due to the business around eSports, but higher frame rates give you better response times, and we’ve known this for a very long time. In my world, in fighting games, the games only draw at 60 FPS usually, but they can run at a 120 Hz or 144 Hz mode so that they can poll for inputs more frequently, which makes the games feel better to play. Resolution ought to have a tangible impact in FPS games as well.

    • telllos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 month ago

      It’s funny but I think my playstation 5is a Neflix machine and my most played game is days gone…

      For some reason I feel like nothing interesting got released so far in this generation. Nothing big from Naughty dog. T.T

  • JakenVeina@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    ·
    1 month ago

    So, the scheme is basically to have you, the publisher, invest some money into marketing the game, to get potential players aware of it, then have them pay a one-time premium to actually play it, if they’re interested.

    • Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 month ago

      If that’s not the business model, then I’m honestly not playing it.

      And while I may be outnumbered by children playing Fortnite obsessively, at this stage of life I do have more money than gaming time.

      • taladar@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        I am okay with the “I made this game for fun and publish it for free/pay what you want because I can’t be bothered with monetization” business model too.

    • MoonMelon
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Sorry that doesn’t drive MAU, DAU, or ARPPU. Also we want users on our walled garden data harvesting service that’s just “Steam but Worse”, so I’m afraid you need to close your studio. What’s that? Sorry you’re breaking up, must be something wrong with the phone here in the Swiss Alps. Ok ta ta.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      There’s more to game development than that. Setting, art style, gameplay loop, interface…

      The argument being made is that a “proven” mechanism for monetization is getting in the way of developing other attributes of gameplay, as the

      • get potential players aware of it

      and

      • then have them pay

      Steps are made the focus of design, and only known existing formulas for the above encourage the

      • invest some money

      step.

  • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Nothing inside a video game should cost real money.

    It’s an abuse of how games work and what games are.

    Only legislation will fix this. If we allow this to continue, there will be nothing else.

    • Takios@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Exactly, the moment things cost real money in the game, the design of the game changes to increase likelihood of spending. Guild Wars 2 e.g. sells increased inventory space…and it fills your inventory with so many crap items that you’ll constantly be managing your inventory without the extra space.

      • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        And you’ll get dick-riders going ‘but inventory management is gameplay, like in survival horror!’

        Okay. So why can you pay five actual dollars to play the game less?

      • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 month ago

        At least you can improve inventory in-game (eg: do normal gameplay quest and crafting stuff to get bigger bags). Some monetization is cash or nothing.

        Still bad when they make something annoying and then charge to fix it.

        Guild wars 2 specifically has a surprising amount of quality of life stuff for free, but you can see places where “we can make money here” won out occasionally.

  • SplashJackson@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    God I hope the gaming industry collapses just like in 1982. We have more than enough retro and indie games to get by until a new business model arises

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      1 month ago

      It won’t collapse in the same way because, like you said, we have tons of indies and they have easy access to publishing now. Hopefully the AAA space collapses though. It looks like it’s going that direction. They’ve forgotten why they exist.

      • Katana314@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        I’m curious if it would expand past games to tech. So many businesses aim for AI to take most of their programming role and fire their staff. Assuming that fails in some hilarious public ways over the next five years, I’m wondering what the old guard that knew the technologies well will do.

        • taladar@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 month ago

          It won’t happen in tech outside gaming because tech outside gaming moves a lot slower so the collapse will happen to the front before the rear even thinks about adopting stupid changes like that.

    • Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      Unfortunately that may well make them double down on the F2P mobile market.

      They’re cheaper to make, and success tends to be tied directly to marketing efforts and exploitation.

    • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      Also, machiens capable of gaming are ubiquitous. Say the console market collapses because people recognize that Playstation and Xbox offer less entertainment per dollar than lighting $20 bills on fire. PCs, phones, tablets, maybe even smart televisions are everywhere. It’s not like the early 80’s when having a computer in your house is a new idea people were still figuring out.

      It would be fun watching some of the bigger studios fart themselves to death though. I don’t know if we need Ubisoft, EA or Activision anymore.

      • SplashJackson@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        Each of those studios, UbiSoft, EA, and Activision, all forcing their employees back into the office. Car accidents up, environmental health down.

        Fuck them.

  • TachyonTele@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    So this guy was at the top of Sony America until 2018 and now there’s suddenly a lack of creativity in the industry? Please.

    He’s the strategic advisor at Tencent Games now, so I’m sure he’s all over creativity there…

  • barnaclebutt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    I found UFO 50 pretty creative. Maybe it’s not the problem of creativity. It’s the problem of monopolistic gaming companies run by people that don’t like games.

  • Hydra_Fk@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Laughs as I remember pumping endless quarters to continue in old cabinet arcade games.

  • Miphera@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    No guys, don’t you understand, it’s all that DEI that’s ruining games, trust. /s

  • NutWrench@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    I’ve played the original “Deus Ex” for years and I’m still discovering new things about it. I don’t even have to worry about Windows anymore. I can play it with Wine on Linux.

        • basmati@lemmus.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          Better performance, stability, and usually less fatal interactions with whatever de you’re running.

  • yamanii@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    As Tim Willis from Space Marine 2 said:

    “We don’t need to sell four million units to make it [Space Marine 2] a success,” Willits said. “There are many games, sadly, especially out of North American developers, where if you do not sell five million copies you are a failure. I mean, what business are we in where you fail if you sell less than five million?”

  • ShinkanTrain
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Shawn, bro… not to say it’s your fault, but it started with you

    • Kernal64@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      I’ll say it. He’s definitely at least partially responsible for this situation that he’s complaining about now.