• Death_Equity@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    81
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    There is no overlap in the venn diagram of people who want a Cybertruck and people who consider pedestrian safety when buying a personal vehicle.

    Actually, is there anyone that makes vehicle purchasing decisions considering pedestrian safety scores?

    • WxFisch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      75
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      No, because no one intends to hit a pedestrian with the car they are buying. That’s why we need to mandate safer vehicles, not trust people to factor that in as they look for a car.

      • Albbi@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 month ago

        I say build in spring loaded spikes that impale the driver in the event of a collision with a pedestrian. Since the cyber truck pretty much has that facing the pedestrians, if the driver is faced with the threat as well maybe they’ll be more careful with their driving.

      • reddig33@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        I’d say auto stop features and multiple camera views on reverse are a good selling point of a car. I certainly regret not getting the overhead camera view on the vehicle I purchased (and the blind spot indicators which don’t apply to pedestrians).

        I’d also like to see the infra-red windshield overlays make it out of the prototype stage. This night vision/heat vision feature helps to alert you to deer, dogs, wildlife, and those dumb asses that insist on walking down the road at night in dark clothing in my neighborhood.

        • NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 month ago

          auto stop features and multiple camera views

          That wasn’t meant by “pedestrian safety”.

          Pedestrian safety is looking at the amount of damage that a car could do to pedestrians in an accident. It comes down to how the car is built. Things like no sharp edges, no hard materials, no dangerous liquids can leak out etc.

          It is quite the opposite of what Massa Elon had in mind when he designed that silly truck. And that’s why this is a topic at all.

    • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Doesn’t the existence of this modded truck prove that statement wrong? Because I’m pretty sure you made the only statement explicitly refuted by the existence of this truck.

      Congratulations?

      • barsoap@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        It’s not actually any safer, they taped thin rubber strips over the exposed edges. Someone’s friends with an inspector who played dumb, me thinks.

    • BlackEco@lemmy.blackeco.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Parents, maybe? They are usually so concerned about children’s safety, whether that’s their kids or someone else’s.

      • 0x0@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 month ago

        No, most parents will consider vehicle safety for their kids, airbag effects on toddlers, scoring on side impacts, etc… and don’t give two shits about other people’s kids.