• Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    22 hours ago

    I would like everyone to note that Peter Link, who posts endless articles, has a very obvious agenda, but almost never comments.

    Posting article after article but never engaging is bad faith participation in Lemmy.

    • Peter LinkOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Sorry if you think that my posting reflects “bad faith”. I have responded to comments a few times, but generally I’m trying to get useful articles out to the Fediverse. (I also post a lot in Mastodon.)

      I did write one long comment on voting for Harris, where I stated that it is a difficult decision for me, because each day I get angrier at the Biden/Harris blank check for Bibi. At the same time, I clearly don’t want Trump.

    • FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Over 500 posts and barely a dozen comments.

      And yeah their posts clearly have an agenda. A lot of “both sides bad don’t vote” kind of stuff.

      • simplymath@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        “both sides bad” has won almost every US election, according to this chart.

        It’s literally the most popular position when you consider voter turnout and % of votes for each main party.

        • FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          6 hours ago

          You’re confusing not voting and not liking both parties. A lot of people don’t vote because they don’t give a shit. Or simply can’t.

          I haven’t voted most of my life because I’m disabled and can’t make it to polling booths.

          In Switzerland we have a dozen major parties and turnout is around 30%. Our open list system allows for extensive “customisation of votes” and lets you choose from hundreds of candidates. People just don’t vote because they can’t be bothered or are busy aren’t really motivated etc.

          • simplymath@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 hours ago

            I’m definitely not confused. Perhaps we have irreconcilable philosophical differences, but I’m certainly not confused by percentages.

            Personally, I would a 30% voter turnout as a damning indictment of the system, particularly when Switzerland was one of the last countries in Europe to legalize women’s right to vote and the right to gay marriage.

            For most of the US’s history, most people were simply not allowed to participate in that system and twice this century the winner lost the popular vote. How is it do hard to believe that someone would feel legitimately disenfranchised and frustrated by that system?

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 hours ago

            And Republicans have made it harder and harder to vote over the years.

            Mail-in voting should be legal in all states and election day should be a federal holiday. You should also be automatically registered to vote if you are a citizen and get a driver’s license or ID card.