• adrianmalacoda
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    3 years ago

    This argument makes sense for natural language (where one can argue that a word “is a real word” or that a word means something simply because it is commonly used in that manner), not so much for proper nouns in my opinion. Linux is a specific thing, created by a specific person (who named it after himself), developed by a specific team for specific purposes. Whether or not people mistakenly believe other unrelated things are also Linux doesn’t change the truth of what Linux actually is.

    If “the vast majority of people” mistakenly believed the Earth was flat or that the sun revolved around it, that does not suddenly make it so. “The vast majority of people” being ignorant should be taken as an opportunity to address that ignorance, not perpetuate it.

    • heady@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 years ago

      If the vast majority of people believed the earth is called gazorp that would absolutely suddenly make it so.

    • sproid
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 years ago

      If “the vast majority of people” mistakenly believed the Earth was flat or that the sun revolved around it, that does not suddenly make it so.

      Another False equivalence. That is an example of a proven fact that some people don’t accept because of true ignorance or wilful ignorance. Anyone who knows what GNU/Linux is accept its concept. Its just that there is no need to go your way to mention written or verbal “I use GNU/XINU/PBM/OpenSSL/Samba/KDE/Graphite-nord-dark-theme/Linux.”
      See my other comment.