• Pelicanen@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          As serving Russian interests, what kind of connection do they have to the Russian state if they so brazenly vote for the wishes of Putin?

          • agarorn@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            That is a new definition of treason for me, but okay call it what you want.

            Is a cooperation on space travel also treason?

            • Pelicanen@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              That’s a false equivalence, this isn’t exactly cooperation towards a mutually beneficial goal, this is just trying to reduce support for a country which by sheer coincidence is an enemy of Putin.

      • 133arc585
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        28
        ·
        1 year ago

        It follows rather directly. For it to be high treason to be against sending more military resources to Ukraine would mean that either the representatives are members of the Ukrainian government or, as was implied here, that Ukraine is a puppet state.

        It’s not high treason against the USA to be against the USA sending military resources to another country. You can only commit high treason against your own country.

        • McBinary@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          32
          arrow-down
          13
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          You’re willfully dancing around the actual point OP is making. You can’t be a grown adult and think this concretely without doing so in bad faith.

          The point is that opposing this is directly showing support for Russia…

          • 133arc585
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            17
            arrow-down
            17
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            The point is that opposing this is directly showing support for Russia…

            Which guess what: isn’t high treason. If you’ll notice, I havent offered my opinion here or participated elsewhere in the thread.

            I was simply pointing out that using the term “high treason” here is rather silly and nonfactual.

                  • albigu@lemmygrad.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Enemies there refers to during war in which the USA is not, and giving “Aid and Comfort” there means material aid and has literally no relation in the text to whether you receive something for such aid in return. By interpreting “giving them aid” as promoting foreign policy that helps a rival nation as “treason” using that text, you have to completely ignore the part about “bribes” and assume that it applies even in peacetime, which means that every foreign policy decision that helps a rival would be “treason”. I’m sure the USA has some other backwards law that prevents lobbying but only if the lobbyist is not white or is a foreigner (and would be happy to have anybody who actually reads laws send it to me), but it is not in the text of the constitution and to claim it is is just either blatantly false or some Ouija-board-level spirit of the law shit. You should definitely read before you write.

            • socsa
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              8
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              So you aren’t making any argument at all, and are just saying “everyone look at my bold linguistic castle. It is very cromulent.”

        • Pacifist
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          19
          ·
          1 year ago

          You should probably shut your stupid fucking mouth.

      • agarorn@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        You say that US citizens (the republican politicians) who do not support Ukraine should be trialed for treason. This implies that Ukraine is a part of the US, doesn’t it?

      • krolden
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        17
        ·
        1 year ago

        your name is pacifist but you support sending weapons of death and destruction into a conflict where they will be used to kill people? they’re sending fucking clusterbombs dude what is it going to take to convince you people this is not a good thing?

        • haohao@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          23
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Hey, Ukrainian here. Try to convince me that it’s a bad thing. Russians shelling Ukrainian cities with cluster munitions is okay, but Ukraine fighting back is bad? Russia brought all the deaths and destruction, not Ukraine, or “the west”.

            • haohao@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              At least they have ~3% fail rate and will be used against military targets vs russian 30-40% fail rate and used in the cities