I’d like to settle on a distro, but none of them seem to click for me. I want stability more than anything, but I also value having the latest updates (I know, kind of incompatible).

I have tested Pop!_Os, Arch Linux, Fedora, Mint and Ubuntu. Arch and Pop being the two that I enjoyed the most and seemed the most stable all along… I am somewhat interested in testing NixOS although the learning curve seems a bit steep and it’s holding me back a bit.

What are you using as your daily drive? Would you recommend it to another user? Why? Why not?

  • mrmanager@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Arch because I like simple.

    Other distros are an exercise in patience I think. Each Ubuntu version has different names and versions of stuff like docker, mysql and everything else. It’s really annoying to work with. I assume all six month distros are like that. And you have to add extra repos, keys and whatnot for it to even find things.

    With arch, since it’s rolling, I just install the latest version and I already know the command. It’s always the same. Always.

    There are many reasons I like arch but the simplicity of the installations is one of my favorite reasons to use it.

    • eayavas
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Also openSUSE project provide OBS, which is replacement of Aur on Arch.

    • Spunky Monkey@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is the way.

      I changed GPU recently and felt like doing a fresh install and tried openSUSE Tumbleweed (was using EndeavourOS before). Very stable and fast.

    • Gymnae@lemmy.wxbu.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      second that. after arch, manjaro, debian and ubuntu i landed there as my daily desktop driver.

      for servers, i still stick with debian, but might also go for an immutable rolling release distro next

    • 5i5phyu5@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Absolutely. Rolling distro with stability is very rare in the linux world. Opensuse TW is rock solid with updated software. I stopped distro hopping because of it.

    • Revan343@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I’m actually in the middle of deciding on a new distro, I’m trying to get away from Ubuntu/snap, but Debian 12 with LxQt or Xfce isn’t playing nice with my laptop. I just finished writing out Mint and Tumbleweed flash drives, gonna give them both a shot, but I’ve never really used openSUSE before.

      Any tips? Particular things you like about it

      • L3ft_F13ld!@social.fossware.space
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Honestly, what I like about it started with the mascot. Otherwise, I like the fact that the rolling release has automatic testing to make sure it’s mostly reliable. Many people will also tell you how amazing YaST, their “control panel”, is. There’s definitely some stuff to get used to, like patterns and zypper. But, for a set and forget system, it’s hard to beat IMO.

  • TiffyBelle@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Debian. I always come back to Debian.

    It’s just a rock solid, multipurpose distro that has everything. If you have an issue with some older software versions, you can just track testing or sid and treat it as rolling release or use flatpaks for GUI apps.

    To me, Debian is almost perfect.

      • smpl@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I decided to switch to Devuan a long time ago, because it’s an opinionated Debian that align better with my preferences. The Devuan community prefer the simple solutions like ALSA, sysvinit (and others), udev independent of systemd, would rather avoid dbus and so on… the thing is I’ve never made the switch. I’m now running old old stable Debian with sysvinit, ALSA etc… but soon™ when I decide to clean up the mess that is my computer, I’ll rebase to Devuan which does what I want out of the box :P

    • mrmanager@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I wouldn’t call it rock solid… It was running old versions of kde with lots of bugs. Bugs that had been fixed months ago.

      So I don’t know. It’s good we have choice but I don’t personally see Debian as more stable than arch. I see it as having older bugs than arch.

      • aport@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        KDE could fix 80% of it’s bugs overnight and it will still be the most bug-ridden DE by a longshot

        • mrmanager@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yep, most features and most bugs. I go back and forth between kde and Gnome when a bug annoys me too much.

  • Lemmchen@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 year ago

    For the past six years it has been Kubuntu, but I think it’s time to finally abort Canonical and their idiosyncrasies and choose Debian as a KDE base, especially now that Debian 12 includes non-free firmware by default.

  • shrugal@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Fedora! To me it sits right at the sweet spot of stability and bleeding edge (they call it “leading edge”), and I’m very happy with how they run things (including the most recent controversy!).

  • Meow.tar.gz@lemmy.goblackcat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    Arch Linux is my go-to distro because I can literally install it in half the time that it takes a lot of others. I also like that it is very lightweight.

    • ScotinDub@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Same here. I just get muddled up with all the other package managers. Tried Debian/Ubuntu a few times but always end up with a load of ppas and everything being a mess!

        • DudeWithaTwist@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Just skimmed my AUR install list, and yea most of them seem to be on there, good to know! If my laptop ever shits the bed, I’ll give this a shot haha.

      • aurtzy@social.fossware.space
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        If you mean use both at the same time, you can! If you check out the website for Nix (or Guix, its Lispy cousin), instructions are provided for installing it alongside your current distro as an additional package manager for those who want to use it without reinstalling or using a vm.

    • di5ciple@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      NixOS user now. Long time fan of Arch with BTRFS and snapshots but Nix takes everything to the next level.

  • TCB13@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Debian – The Universal Operating System

    Because it’s universal, runs on everything rock solid and stable.

  • bloodfart
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    Debian stable, the os for 50 year old nudists.

    It’s the stable branch of one of the oldest distributions around.