• conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      It doesn’t matter in the slightest.

      Making a tool that provides a private communication service literally everyone should have unrestricted access to does not make you an accomplice to anything.

      • lennybird@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        The ISP will absolutely cooperate with law enforcement though, unlike telegram. That seems the nature of the issue in that there is a lack of moderation and oversight, which anonymity is not mutually-exclusive from flagging nefarious activities, ideally. I REALLY am not too keen on giving safe harbor to the likes of pedos and traffickers and what have you.

      • stupidcasey@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        Why? They happily hand all your data over to whoever asks and so does everyone else that’s why they can single them out because you’re already bought and paid for.

    • fine_sandy_bottom@lemmy.federate.cc
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      As always, there’s a lot of nuance which is lost on Lemmy users.

      It’s a question of exactly what telegram is being used for, what telegram the company can reasonably be aware of, what they’ve been asked to do, and what they’ve done.

    • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 months ago

      It is but so are phones and computers in general. Same with cars, many crimes require transportation.