• ben_dover
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      28 days ago

      it’s the only one i knew about before the other comment. with more browsers using it, we may not need to build another engine from scratch to broaden competition

      • LeFantome@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        27 days ago

        I think this is the argument that the Ladybird people have made:

        • Chrome is dependent on Google ( obviously )
        • Edge is dependent on Google ( based on Chromium )
        • Firefox is dependent on Google ( 80% of revenue )
        • Safari is dependent on Google ( $4 billion from Google )
        • most other browsers are dependent on Google ( use Chromium ) - Brave, Vivaldi, Opera, etc

        Ladybird is intended to be a truly independent browser and especially independent of Google.

        • Leaflet@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          26 days ago

          Safari isn’t dependent on Google. It was just a no-brainer for Apple to take a free 20 billion dollars from Google for setting the default search engine to something most users would want anyway.