I know Wikipedia is liberal and pro NATO-crap, but this is so insane it’s funny.
Edit: Web Archive seems a bit slow, so a faster link here: https://thumbs.gfycat.com/SnarlingContentFowl-mobile.mp4
I know Wikipedia is liberal and pro NATO-crap, but this is so insane it’s funny.
Edit: Web Archive seems a bit slow, so a faster link here: https://thumbs.gfycat.com/SnarlingContentFowl-mobile.mp4
Wikipedia has long been a tool.
https://hongkongfp.com/2021/09/14/exclusive-wikipedia-bans-7-mainland-chinese-power-users-over-infiltration-and-exploitation-in-unprecedented-clampdown/
https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org/message/6ANVSSZWOGH27OXAIN2XMJ2X7NWRVURF/
I swear I saw a post on Lemmy about Wikipedia blocking access from Mainland Chinese IPs claiming protection from abuse. I tried searching for it but couldn’t find it. Anyone else know what I’m talking about? Or was it just a fever dream of my own creation?
No idea, but Wikipedia is a tool as far as geopolitics regarding ANY country/system other than “Western neoliberal democracy” under “international rules based order”.
Well aware:
https://wikipedia.fivefilters.org/
Secondly:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Perennial_sources
Way more than those examples on the page
Wait, I did not know of that page that Wikipedia itself has. That fivefilters blog page is also nice. I know of examples like smearing of the Swiss Policy Research page.