I’m a little bit underwhelmed, I thought that based off the fact so many people seem to make using this distro their personality I expected… well, more I guess?

Once the basic stuff is set-up, like wifi, a few basic packages, a desktop environment/window manager, and a bit of desktop environment and terminal customisation, then that’s it. Nothing special, just a Linux distribution with less default programs and occasionally having to look up how to install a hardware driver or something if you need to use bluetooth for the first time or something like that.

Am I missing something? How can I make using Arch Linux my personality when once it’s set up it’s just like any other computer?

What exactly is it that people obsess over? The desktop environment and terminal customisation? Setting up NetworkManager with nmcli? Using Vim to edit a .conf file?

    • SentientFishbowlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 months ago

      Not too familiar with it, in what way would you consider it better?

      • paperd@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        It is better in all the ways. Newer packages, no imperative config, reproducible.

        • theshatterstone54@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Replaces the Archwiki with basically 0 docs, a large chunk of your Linux knowledge no longer applies, you can’t compile from source (even if you mostly don’t need to), everything is different, the nix language kinda sucks until you “get” it, etc.

          But it has a lot of advantages too if you have the time and desire to learn it.

          • paperd@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Replaces the Archwiki with basically 0 docs

            Arch wiki is still relevant, I still use it as a reference on my NixOS box.

            a large chunk of your Linux knowledge no longer applies

            Your pacman and pacur (or whatever the name of the air helper soup de jour is this week) will no longer apply. Most of my linux knowledge was still applicable. You have all the same programs that run in the same way as they do on arch.

            you can’t compile from source

            Sure you can. Want to compile everything from source? Just turn off using the cache. NixOS is a source based distro.

            everything is different

            Also no. I use the same programs I can get on most other distros.

            the nix language kinda sucks until you “get” it, etc.

            If you have ever used another functional language its fine.

          • fxdave
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            I recently installed Nix alongside with Arch. I feel the same. After years of using Arch I spent two days to get everything configured the same as in my Arch, and I haven’t finished it yet.

      • paperd@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        nVidia drivers on NixOS are easier and more pain free that on any other distro I’ve used.