• Thann
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 years ago

    It actually doesn’t matter if they’re “reliable”, what matters is the evidence they’ve compiled. That article proves that Russian military hardware was in Ukraine in 2014, completely invalidating your pathetic “separatists” theory. You have only ad hominems at your defense, yet you accuse others of spreading misinformation.

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆OP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      3 years ago

      Yeah, just like US compiled evidence on Iraq having weapons of mass destruction and then proceeded to massacre a million people there. You’re literally spreading imperialist propaganda here. Also, might want to learn what ad hominem actually means. Hint, it’s not when somebody calls you out for being an idiot.

      • Thann
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        3 years ago

        They never showed the evidence… here the evidence is in the open for the world to scrutinize. Why don’t you scrutinize it instead of talking out your ass

        P.S.

        • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆OP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          3 years ago

          Please point out where I’m claiming your argument is wrong based on the quality of your character.

          They never showed the evidence… here the evidence is in the open for the world to scrutinize.

          The same way US showed evidence for Iraq having WMD, if you still don’t understand why US sources aren’t credible you’re even dumber than I thought. Talking to idiots is so exhausting.

          • Thann
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            3 years ago

            you’re refusing to address the evidence that bellingcat presents because you claim they’re unreliable. your attacking the person making the argument, not the argument its self. how is this not obvious?

            The same way US showed evidence for Iraq having WMD

            Please show me this evidence.

            • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆OP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              3 years ago

              I have repeatedly addressed your “evidence” as not being credible. I’ve explained to you that US has a long history of fabricating evidence and it is not a reliable source. Once you provide me with an independent source making these claims we can have a discussion about that. What you’re doing is the equivalent of sending me a breitbart article and asking me to address it.

              Please show me this evidence.

              Show you the evidence that US WMD claims in Iraq were false? You’re a next level troll bud.

              https://www.vox.com/2016/7/9/12123022/george-w-bush-lies-iraq-war

              • Thann
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                3 years ago

                No, you’re claiming the US “showed the evidence” of WMDs and they did not. they said they cant reveal their sources, and we need to just trust them. Now everyone knows not to trust them at their word.

                This contrasts to the bellingcat article where they show video evidence, and satellite images to geolocate a russian BUK missile launcher. Which has yet to be disproved in the last 6 years… these are very different situations…