• ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆OP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    3 years ago

    I mean when the soldiers moved out of the naval base and into the towns.

    [citation needed] also quick question, why weren’t people resisting these supposed soldiers moving into the towns the way they’re resisting right now during an actual invasion?

    Doesn’t say the Russian language was outlawed. just says when you’re interfacing with the government you need to do it in Ukrainian.

    Nice mental gymnastics there.

    Doesn’t say it’s justification to invade.

    It is a justification to secede though which is what actually happened.

    Youre literally justifying the invasion of donbas and the invasion of crimea.

    People of Donbas literally chose to fight for their independence, and they’ve been fighting the right wing regime for 8 years. Denying their right to self determination exposes you for what you truly are.

    I’m being told that by you, but it’s unsupported by evidence.

    That’s literally supported by all the available evidence and basic logic. The fact that you continue to deny this says a lot about you.

    I don’t understand why you call russian soldiers “separatists”.

    There is no evidence to support your conspiracy theory I’m afraid.

    • Thann
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      3 years ago

      why weren’t people resisting these supposed soldiers moving into the towns the way they’re resisting right now during an actual invasion?

      I already answered this; because, in an attempt to prevent ww3, they decided to retreat and surrender instead of fight. Now they understand that placation has no value.

      Nice mental gymnastics there.

      No one says Russian is “outlawed” in the US, but if you only speak it, and try to get your car registered, you’re going to have a hard time. you’re one doing mental gymnastics to say that’s a justification for war…

      People of Donbas literally chose to fight for their independence, and they’ve been fighting the right wing regime for 8 years.

      That’s literally supported by all the available evidence and basic logic.

      I’ve seen the satellite images of tanks rolling over the border, but you insist they are separatists.
      A civilian airliner was shot down by a BUK, but still you insist it was separatists.
      If Ukraine sends tanks to support the “separatists” in Moscow, would you say that’s not an invasion?

      • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆OP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        3 years ago

        I already answered this; because, in an attempt to prevent ww3, they decided to retreat and surrender instead of fight. Now they understand that placation has no value.

        That’s not an answer. Why were people of Crimea not resisting the way people are resisting right now, or the way people of Donbas resister Ukrainian regime. When people are invaded they fight back. I’m not aware of a single invasion where people just shrug and say I guess we’ve been invaded, oh well. The fact that you keep trying to spin this shows just how dishonest you are.

        No one says Russian is “outlawed” in the US, but if you only speak it, and try to get your car registered, you’re going to have a hard time. you’re one doing mental gymnastics to say that’s a justification for war…

        Human rights watch must also be doing mental gymnastics. Real galaxy brain logic here bud.

        I’ve seen the satellite images of tanks rolling over the border, but you insist they are separatists.

        Oh please do share these images with the rest of the class.