• TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    234
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    #VOTE!

    Wear diapers if you have to (I’m serious. I guarantee the wait times in republican run areas is going to be atrocious long), stay in line (if you are in line they have to let you vote by law), and #VOTE!

      • SuperIce@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        53
        ·
        3 months ago

        CA just does universal mail in ballots. I can read about the issues and candidates at home while filling out the ballot and then walk a block to a letter drop box to submit my ballot. Then I can just track its status online. It’s great.

        • something_random_tho@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          40
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          It really is a good system that’s super easy and builds confidence in the election through online tracking. No wonder Republicans don’t want it in their states.

        • MelodiousFunk@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          3 months ago

          Same, except I skip the mail part and take it directly to a drop box. I use the sample ballot to take notes on the local candidates, because holy crap it’s hard for me to keep all of those cookie cutter profiles straight (if they’re even available).

        • CapeWearingAeroplane@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Honest question: With this kind of system, how do you verify who filled in the ballot? In my country we have “mail in” voting, which consists of going to a polling station in some other district than the one your from, filling in a ballot in the normal way, and then they send it for you.

          Also: I’ve seen people talking about how you have to vote in person on election day, don’t the polling stations open before that? I usually vote a couple days before election day, the polling stations open like two weeks before…

          • PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            You have to register to receive a ballot. Registration is with the state and they run an id check on you. You only get a single ballot. Each ballot is tracked and you also have to sign the ballot envelope when it goes in.

            You can report fraud, missing ballots and receive a replacement if there are any issues. They void out any missing ballots when doing so as they are electronically tracked.

          • BigMacHole@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            10
            ·
            3 months ago

            Exactly! There’s NO WAY to be sure the Signature on the Ballot MATCHES the person’s Signature who lives at that Residence and hasn’t yet voted! It’s IMPOSSIBLE! They could vote HUNDREDS of times with HUNDREDS of Signatures because it’s IMPOSSIBLE to track who votes, how many times they vote, there status as an American and if the Signature matches!

            • CapeWearingAeroplane@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              I wasn’t implying anything here, no need to be a dick about it. Like I said: I’m my country we don’t have this system.

              The kind of possibilities I was thinking about were more along the lines of an abusive spouse forcing their partner to sign a ballot, someone stealing a neighbours ballot out of their mailbox and forging their signature, or some family member doing the same to other family members.

              Signatures can be forged quite easily if you have access to other signatures from that person, so I was honestly wondering what kind of system they have in place to ensure the kind of things mentioned above don’t happen.

              Also, I guess I was kind of assuming ballots weren’t signed, in order to protect the anonymity of the voters, and that there was some more sophisticated system in place.

              • PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                3 months ago

                Voting in another persons name is a felony and there have been a few people who have been caught. Its not worth it, kind of like armed robbery of a mail carrier. Quick way to get fucked by the state.

                I believe in Oregon (the pioneer in mail in voting) you’re looking at potential fines or jail time depending, with a potential mix of fraud, forgery, identity theft and other laws being broken.

                But the state has this to say:

                Is voter fraud a problem in Oregon?

                ​​​​​​​No. Oregon elections are secure and protected against voter fraud in all but exceedingly rare instances. In 2020, out of millions of votes cast, residents and local elections officials reported 140 instances of potential voter fraud. Of these 140 cases, four cases were referred to the Oregon Department of Justice and two of those are pending resolution.​

                By comparison, in 2018 there were a total of 84 total reports of voter fraud. Two were referred to the Department of Justice.

                A review of the vote by mail system​ by the state’s Legislative Fiscal Office found from 2000-2019 there were approximately 61 million ballots cast. Of those, 38 criminal convictions of voter fraud were obtained. This amounts to a .00006% rate. ​

                • CapeWearingAeroplane@sopuli.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  Well I guess that still has the same effect of removing anonymity, but if it gets more people voting it’s still a net positive. To my knowledge the US has a concerningly low turnout rate for elections, so anything that helps…

                  I guess what I’m most concerned about is a situation where people are forced to vote for a specific candidate, and it doesn’t really seem to me like there’s any mechanism in place to prevent that (?)

            • catbum@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              Your style of sarcasm is so well done, nobody realizes the /s is implied. A+++ seller, would buy vote AGAIN AND AGAIN!!!

      • Todd Bonzalez@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        66
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        No, you vote by mail because you live somewhere that allows it.

        If you live somewhere red, you probably need to show up in person on election day, and wait around for hours hoping that you don’t get disenfranchised.

        • CaptDust@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          29
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          EDIT 2: This map is NOT ENTIRELY ACCURATE. Spot checking NY and PA - these states have restrictions on Absentee ballots BUT also offer less restrictive Early Mail In voting which IS NOT represented. Check your latest state laws here: https://www.nass.org/can-i-vote/absentee-early-voting

          In seven sixteen states, voters still need a reason to vote absentee. That means many voters in these states will need to vote in person at a polling place.

          Edit- replaced with newer map from '22, excuse required states doubled since '20.

          • madcaesar@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            3 months ago

            Wait…wtf is up with New York? I get the other shit states, but New York requires a reason to vote absentee?

            • revelrous@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              3 months ago

              Hm. I’m not sure this map is accurate. NY has had shit voter laws for forever (closed primary, lengthy registration cut offs, no early voting, restricted absentee ballots, etc.), but with covid they made it temporarily less shit. Then voters asked for them to be more shit again (Idfk), and then the governor made the accessibility changes permanent anyways?

              TLDR: NY is a hot mess.

            • CaptDust@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              I checked into NY and PA, it seems like these two states have introduced a second type of mail voting. From PA website

              • Mail-in ballot: Any registered voter may apply to vote by mail in the next election. You do not have to provide a reason for why you want to vote by mail ballot.

              • Absentee ballot: If you will be out of your municipality on Election Day or if you have a disability or illness that prevents you from going to your polling place on Election Day, you can request this ballot type, which requires you to provide a reason for why you want to vote by mail ballot.

              This map appears to be covering Absentee ballot restrictions - not all mail in voting options.

              • PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                That seems normal, oregon does this too. However, they automatically enroll every adult in mail in voting whenever you interact with the state:

                Dmv licensing, marriage license, auto registration renewal, etc - you automatically get enrolled for mail in voting (or they just update your address).

                It is highly efficient and kind of magical, if one of the few things our government does well, lol.

          • Head@lemmings.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Why the hell is Rhode Island labeled but not Connecticut or Vermont etc? Bizarre choice there.

        • bquintb@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          I live in the very red state of Indiana. voting by mail was and always has been an option. but, yes, I understand that there are some places where that’s not a choice. I wasn’t trying to imply that.

      • TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        Or if they didn’t vote in the last election. They are cutting out names that close to this one. Check it right up till a week from election day to give yourself time to fix their shenanigans.

        • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Legally you have to miss two federal elections, then they have to send you a letter to the address on your voter registration and you have to fail to respond to that letter and then miss a third federal election at a minimum before they can remove you. Or they have to have evidence you’ve moved or died.

          So if you vanish from the voter rolls and none of those are true, fix it and then start looking for a lawyer or start organizing with others in the same vote to get a lawyer as a group. And VOTE.

          • TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            “Oops. Sorry, sir. Must be a glitch in the system. Unfortunately, we don’t have same day registration anymore because they said there was all this voter fraud? Make sure you get that all taken care of before the next election. Oh, and you’ll need your birth certificate on hand.”

            Check it, check it, and check it again. I go on every week and check now. I don’t trust them one bit.

    • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      If you live in one of these 18 states, sign up for mail in voting and have your ballot for a month so that you can research every name on the ballot. I know what skeletons you have in your closet before I vote for you because of this.

      If you don’t, I would recommend calling your state legislature to get a mail in voting initiative on the ballot.

      https://www.ncsl.org/elections-and-campaigns/table-18-states-with-all-mail-elections

      Edit: being able to research the candidate’s full history has had me vote for the Republican candidate twice. I couldn’t, in good conscience, vote for the Democratic candidate for Warden last election, because she was the deputy warden of the guy that just got kicked out for having the highest percentage, and possibly raw number, of deaths in his jail for the entire US. The Republican candidate at least had only attempted to cheat on his taxes, so that was an easy choice. The other time was for city council, and the Democrat had run on a campaign of “helping the homeless,” and then voted in every single hostile architecture, and camping ban he could. The Republican was a newbie, so I gave him a shot.

      • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        Unpopular opinion: Mail in voting shouldn’t be a thing except in extraordinary circumstances like a pandemic.

        There’s a reason for having a secret ballot. People can vote their conscious without fear of any repercussions from members of their community that might disagree with them.

        Imagine a woman not really liking a party that wants to take away her rights. Her husband is a strong supporter of that party. That woman may vote differently if it’s done privately rather than having to fill out a mail in ballot at the kitchen table with her husband looking over her shoulder.

        Sure it’s a pain in the ass to have to go to polling station, but in that location it can be ensured that everyone is voting privately and how they vote is kept secret from everyone.

        • PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 months ago

          Thats incredibly dumb take. I have voted mail in for every election in my entire life, for 26 years. Never had an issue and I have only missed a single local election that was fairly inconsequential. Its nice having 2-3 weeks to figure out how you want to vote.

          My office does not allow people to take time off for voting. After seeing people on cnn who were in line at a poll for 16 hours waiting to vote 4 hours from their house, it seems absolutely insane not to do mail in. Unless the goal is to prevent people from voting, that is.

        • sandbox@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          I get your point, but I think if you weigh up the pros and cons, it’s really not a strong enough justification.

          You could make the same justification to get rid of online banking, for example - and I’d say that a controlling partner can cause much more harm with control over finances than over voting - but hopefully the counter-argument comes clearer into focus from that example.

    • Resonosity@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      AND VOTE EARLY!!!

      Think of Tuesday, November 5th is the LAST day to vote. Some states start early voting up to 3 weeks ahead of election day!

  • Jo Miran
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    136
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    This makes for a good headline but it should not stop you from voting. It was indeed a nice turnout for Harris at The Villages, but that place is not only a cesspool, it is a fucking ginormous cesspool. That group is tint compared to the overall population of that shit hole.

    SOURCE: I split my time between Wyoming and Florida amd my Florida home is unfortunately just a few exits of I-4 away from that fascist lemon party.

    • vividspecter@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      112
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      This makes for a good headline but it should not stop you from voting.

      Nothing should stop you voting. Even if Harris is predicted to have a 30 point margin, you should push for a 40 point margin. Because even if she wins, the fewer Republicans in office, the more policies the Democrats can implement.

      • EvacuateSoul@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        3 months ago

        Not to mention a stronger mandate for them and stronger rebuke of fascism to those getting ideas. Bigger margins shift the overton window.

  • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    117
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    With his presidential grifts and self-pardons on the line, Trump’s gotta be sweating more than JD Vance in a Ramour and Flanagan.

  • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    98
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    3 months ago

    People are enthusiastic to vote when the party listens to them.

    The party had it ass-backwards. “Vote for us and maybe we’ll do what you want. But we both know we’re not gonna” generates no enthusiasm at all. To the contrary, the longer that voting yields the same disappointing results, and the more that people see that the party isn’t interested in anything other than preserving an untenable status quo, the more that this messaging results in apathy and resentment.

    “Fine. We’ll do what you want.” HAS generated enthusiasm.

  • inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    72
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Look, it’s great that she’s doing well but I hope that she won’t do what Hillary did and actually believe she’s got a snowball’s chance in fucking hell to win down there and screw over herself and America by trying to win over a place that’s a pipe dream.

    • Notyou@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      I truly hope she doesn’t. I feel kinda naive thinking she won’t. I know the DNC is great at snatching defeat from the jaws of victory.

        • jj4211@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          While better shot than Florida, NC is likely a lost cause. Went to Trump in both 2016 and 2020, has elected Robinson who is a not job to lieutenant governor… Yeah Cooper won it both times too but I can’t understand how he won elections that at the same time went to Trump, Tillis, and Robinson… They have some polls pitting the well liked Cooper against Trump and Cooper still lost in those polls.

          Obama was the only one in 20 years to win the state and only his first term, and only barely.

          I would be ecstatic to be wrong, but probably a bad bet for relatively fewer potential electoral votes than other uses of their effort.

          • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            As someone who lives in NC, we’re far more purple than you’d think, hell my county always goes blue

            • jj4211@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 months ago

              Sure, there are die hard blue countries, like Wake and Mecklenburg, but take a random exit off the freeways in rural areas and behold all the Trump number stickers, signs and flags that have been up basically since 2016 continuously.

              Despite tending to elect Democrat governors, NC loves Republican senators, presidents, and lieutenant governors… It’s bizarre. As mentioned NC went to Obama in 2008 (Barely), but other than that it’s been a pretty comfortable win for Republican presidents for a long time.

              The house and state legislators can be explained by the malicious districting, but the statewide elections also behave weird.

  • Angry_Autist (he/him)@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    70
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    As a recovering ex-Floridian, the cities are pretty blue, just you know normal regressive fuckery keeps this from being apparent.

    Plenty of minorities tired of old rich white men too. This year is going to be interesting.

    • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      41
      ·
      3 months ago

      The Florida State Supreme Court also thoughtfully put abortion access and marijuana legalization on the November ballot. They should be expecting a pretty noticeable increase in the 18-24 age range participating in the election.

          • Angry_Autist (he/him)@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            3 months ago

            He would and it would make his little micropeen very very upright. He’s even hurting the rich of the state with his stupid af policies. Literally the only people in the entire state who benefit from him are his cronies yet EVERY MAGA CHUD in the whole fucking geographical penis will gladly vote him in for life.

            His sewage regulation removal basically shut miles of prime vacation beach down for 3 years due to raw sewage causing a persistent red tide. In some cases dense enough to be literally red (which is rare outside of whale carcasses or mass dieoffs, and those never last for more than a few weeks).

          • MentallyExhausted@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            3 months ago

            I’m not familiar with Florida’s ballot initiative process, but if it’s on the ballot, it’s not going through the legislature and likely not eligible for a veto.

            • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              Not to mention Medical has been legal there by constitutional amendment since 2016. 2 very conservative voters I know down there (Father and his best Friend) both hold medical cards now for it and would vote for it to pass even while voting for Trump. If Desantis vetoed it, if would weaken his ability to ever become Senator/Congressman for the state when his last term as overlord ends.

      • Angry_Autist (he/him)@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        3 months ago

        The thing about The Villages, it’s mostly a retirement community.

        Not all the trophy wives stay conservative once their husband has passed on.

    • LaVacaMariposa@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      Except a large part of South Florida. They will vote for Republicans because so many Cubans and Venezuelans believe the propaganda that Democrats are socialists.

  • taiyang@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    68
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’m not going to believe Florida flips, but man, stranger things have happened. Imagine what happens if that happens? Or somehow Texas or something. GOP would fucking lose it.

    (But yes, let’s not get crazy, she’s not exactly winning every poll. I just like to wonder.)

    • mwguy@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      60
      ·
      3 months ago

      Florida used to be a legitimate swing state just a couple elections ago. If Georgia can have a Blue election Florida most certainly can.

      • Olhonestjim@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        The neat thing is old people die eventually. Florida Republicans depend on a regular replenishment of horrible people from outside. But they are a nonrenewable resource.

          • I'm back on my BS 🤪@lemmy.autism.place
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            That’s a solid R voting bloc, but not what tipped it. Florida was a swing state, but the influx of retirees started tipping the scale towards Republicans. Once COVID hit and DeSantis was the prominent conspiracy governor right-wingers started coming here even more. Further making the place worse, MAGAs have made politics their main identity. It’s their hobby and find others to socialize with. Since the governor declared that “Florida is where woke goes to die,” these people are coming here to establish their new lives.

          • Olhonestjim@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            3 months ago

            Plenty of children reject their parent’s philosophy, especially when they’re real assholes about it.

    • GladiusB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      Florida has been a swing many times. It made Gore lose. It’s always tight there. Texas? No way. That will always be red.

      • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        If 3% of the voters flipped in 2020 Texas would have been Blue. Less than 2% in Florida. The margins aren’t as big as we many make them out to be. I thought for sure it would be to late to change candidates at this point, but I never thought I’d see this much support for Harris with how many racist and sexist people I encounter in person compared to 10 years ago. Note also, Florida voted blue in 2008 and 2012. (Obama).

        Not saying either are going to flip blue, but a surprise could happen if there are any conservative “values” left in the conservative party.

      • Sarothazrom@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        3 months ago

        The less policies that target hispanics from voting, the purpler texas gets. My sister lives in Dallas and the support for Harris in the cities is colossal right now. They’re a democrat president and a governor away from being swing, but those are hard to fight for.

        • Hazzia@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 months ago

          I’m hoping all the people who have moved there from CA these past couple of years can make a difference, too

          • Bear_pile@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            3 months ago

            I live in Texas and one thing with all the people moving from CA is that they are mostly red voters. A lot of them were willing to move here because they felt it would better represent them while the blue people stayed. At least this is the sentiment that I’ve seen expressed from the people that moved here

            • PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 months ago

              Oregon here, so many family and coworkers have moved to texas and florida because of “liberal politics.” They hated the covid lockdown and want to open carry guns (which ironically is legal here).

            • mwguy@infosec.pub
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              People forget that California is massive. It has more R voters than most red states. It just has more D voters in the aggregate.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      A social media account called Kamala’s Wins flagged the development.

      “The villages in Florida, typically dominated by MAGA extremists, have been completely taken over by Vice President Kamala Harris’ campaign,” the account wrote Saturday. “This is a remarkable turnaround.”

      Democratic influencer Jon Cooper said, Wow! I live only an hour’s drive from The Villages in Florida."

      “Trust me when I say it’s a SUPER-RED community that’s usually a real hotbed of Trump support,” he added this weekend. “The fact that there are over 200 golf carts at this rally for [Harris] today is INCREDIBLE!”

      Come on, dude. That’s a awful source for information.

      • Rapidcreek@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        I’ve seen the videos. This event is like the canary in the coal mine for those that know Florida politics. In 2020, the Villages went something like 70-30 for Trump. It is unusual for them even to have a Harris rally, much less a well attended one.

        • Microw@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 months ago

          Was this rally organized by people from the Villages? Or could it be an outsider thing trying to turn these communities?

          • Rapidcreek@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            3 months ago

            I don’t reckon that makes much difference. Fact is 100s of seniors in golf carts showed up. Usually, the local party folks organize such events.

  • katy ✨@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    3 months ago

    much like texas; florida isn’t red, it’s just disinfranchised by republicans to remove democrats from voter rolls in democratic areas.

    • ashok36@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      That might have been more true before covid but during and after covid we’ve had a huge influx of assholes from all over the country.

      I’m hoping legal weed and abortion being on the ballot will make a difference, and I’m hopeful, but facts are facts.

  • OhStopYellingAtMe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’m hoping she can at least turn some of the red districts of red states purple, flip the already purple areas to blue, and then the blue districts (urban areas) will stay blue.

  • TowardsTheFuture@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Don’t forget we now have to ask for mail in ballots yearly if that’s your thing. (Edit: I mean in Florida, also, we can check to ensure ours has been counted. Check with your county’s elections to see if you can sign up online or if you have to go in person or whatever to sign up for mail in ballot.)

    I get them and just turn them in at a polling location especially because the best I get on election day is I don’t have to stay too long after students leave.

    • iAngus@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      3 months ago

      In Michigan you can opt-in to always get a mail in ballot for every election. Highly recommended.

      Applications for absentee voting can be submitted online. It is recommended to apply at least 15 days before the election.

    • Mountain_Mike_420
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 months ago

      In California when you do mail in ballots you get a notification that your ballot has arrived (and will be counted). I believe you can also opt to bring your mail in ballot and vote “normal” as well.

  • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    38
    ·
    3 months ago

    Impossible I’ve been told Joe Biden was the most popular candidate ever and Dems would 100% lose without him.

    Next you’re going to tell me that not supporting Genocide would earn her even more votes.

    • El Barto@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      55
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      I must admit that I got scared when Biden noped out of the re-election.

      I’m just glad that Kamala seems to be bringing the unification the dems need.

      Get her the nomination already! And people, people, people, don’t do a Hillary and become complacent. Get out and VOTE!

      • knightly the Sneptaur@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Anybody that feared Biden dropping out needs to re-evaluate the way they look at politics. This has been a long time coming, and has been an inevitability since 2015 when Democrat party leadership decided they could pull a fast one during the primary. Before we even knew Biden would be that incumbent, the shape of this election had already been decided.

        Now that Biden has dropped out, the Democrats have a chance. A lot of future history depends on how well Harris can turn the support for “Literally anyone else” to her advantage.

        Edit: I seem to be getting a lot of downvotes for my objectively correct assessments of politics. Seems to me like y’all are either mad that I was right, or Republicans who are mad that Biden dropped out.

        • El Barto@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          Anybody that feared Biden dropping out needs to re-evaluate the way they look at politics.

          In what way?

          • SeriousMite@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            3 months ago

            I don’t know. It’s been pretty clear for a while that the traditional Democrat strategy of winning by courting centrists and staying the course has been less and less effective every election. Tapping into enthusiasm for leftist policies and energizing the base to increase turnout has seemed like the better move for a while. That’s what Obama won big on and then completely failed to deliver.

            Staying the course with the “nothing will fundamentally change” candidate was always a path to losing, and after his disastrous policy on Gaza we were in a nosedive.

            • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              3 months ago

              Leftism isn’t a real thing. It’s just a feeling.

              In a political campaign always want to offer an optimistic future. As we’ve seen with Biden, it doesn’t really matter if he makes the most pro-union policies in history, join picket lines, protect social programs, and only fail to increase minimum wage because his party didn’t have enough votes. “Leftists” don’t care about policies, it’s entirely an emotional thing.

              It’s easy enough to understand. The leftists that voted for Obama became more centrist as they got older. The leftists of today are young people who only know about Obama from wikipedia and what they’re told by politcal grifters on youtube and tiktok. Being young they’re emotional and low information voters.

              Harris offers the same “Hope & Change” feelings that Obama did. Which policies get implemented will be dependent (as always) on which party controls Congress. By the end of her first term hopefully enough of the low information emotional young voters will have more information and be a little more capable of critical thinking to vote for her again.

              Also Gaza has nothing to do with leftism, it’s actually a war between a democracy (Israel) and a fascist regime (Hamas). It just feels leftist LOL.

            • El Barto@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              That’s what Obama won big on and then completely failed to deliver.

              Bro, Imma stop you right there. The GOP shut down the government under Obama TWICE for no reason other than being the little shits that they are and don’t hide nowadays. So, don’t drive this “Obama did nothing” nonsense narrative. Also, ACA. Even the Republicans benefit from it right now.

              Now moving on, I still don’t see what is there to re-evaluate for the people who feared that Biden dropped out. Hindsight is 20/20, and it’s very easy to say “ha, you were wrong!” after the fact.

              • alcoholicorn
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                3 months ago

                Obama didn’t do nothing, he bombed like 9 countries and bailed out the banks after they halved black wealth.

                I can’t say whether the ACA was better than nothing because I still can’t afford healthcare.

          • knightly the Sneptaur@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            I’d been getting shit on for years for trying to tell people Biden would have to drop out to give the Democrats a chance this election. Lo and behold, once he finally does, Democrats are suddenly on track to win.

            Everyone who didn’t understand that this was going to be the case had their heads buried too deep in the sand to hear any of the legitimate, well intentioned criticism of their preferred candidate or the arguments for why switching would be a good thing. Such folks who accused me of being a Republican or a Russian bot when I was actually right cannot be trusted to perform political analysis.

            • El Barto@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              You still haven’t said in what way people who feared Biden dropping out need to re-evaluate the way they look at politics.

              • knightly the Sneptaur@pawb.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                3 months ago

                They were afraid of a thing that would significantly improve their electoral chances because they were too wrapped up in their support for a presumed nominee to put their biases aside and consider the benefits of switching to another candidate.

                • El Barto@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  Your sentence comes down to: “Their biases made them afraid of considering better options.”

                  Specifically what biases are you talking about?

      • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        21
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Not a single person voting Democrat does so because they thought Biden was a great candidate.

        It appears nobody has learned anything from Hillary’s loss in 2016.

        Establishment ghouls are not popular Democrats. Conservatives will vote Republican anways, appeasing to the right is worthless.

        Only progressives get independents to vote blue.

        • El Barto@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Not a single person voting Democrat does so because they thought Biden was a great candidate.

          This is where you lost me. As if boomer Democrats are not a thing. But let’s keep on reading…

          It appears nobody has learned anything from Hillary’s loss in 2016.

          Lost me again. I don’t know why people keep forgetting about 2020.

          • orcrist@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 months ago

            It’s unlikely that they forgot about boomer Democrats. Many of us have parents or grandparents who qualify. I can’t think of a single person who told me how great of a candidate Biden was. I don’t remember anyone who was extremely excited by the policies he wanted to enact. Of course I can only talk about people that I met, my friends and family and community.

            • cogman@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              3 months ago

              Were it not for Israel, I’d be telling you about how great Biden has been domestically (except the boarder). His administration has by and large been very progressive with the policies it’s enacted. Biden’s abhorrent sucking up to Israel during an active genocide is the huge dark spot on his presidency.

              It is a bit dumb that “he’s too old” is what got him out.

              • El Barto@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                3 months ago

                Hm, no. Neither of those arguments got him out.

                “I’ll tax the billionaires” got him out.

                Unless he did some 4D chess with the whole bowing out after the RNC.

                • cogman@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  Nah, he turned deeply unpopular right after the debate with trump. He was hemorrhaging in the polls. His backers abandoned him because they feared trump winning. Several polls about biden dropping out had something like 75% of democrats wanting him to drop.

                  Kamala has ran to the left of biden on a number of issues. If this were a “billionares fear taxes” situation she wouldn’t have been the replacement. There are some rumors that establishment dems didn’t want Kamala to be the pick because of her policies.

            • El Barto@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              You’re correct in your last sentence. In many communities, everyone thought that everyone was voting for Hillary Clinton in 2016.

          • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            11
            ·
            3 months ago

            Biden won marginally because he was marginally better than Hillary and was the Obama guy.

            Bernie would have won by a landslide.

              • alcoholicorn
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                It’s not wrong. Free healthcare is a hell of a selling point.

                Having healthcare (or saving $5,000 if you’re lucky enough already be paying for health insurance), every year would have gotten every single millennial and gen-z to the polls.

                Dems would have a 1-party state if they threw in housing too.

        • zenitsu@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          19
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Not a single person voting Democrat does so because they thought Biden was a great candidate.

          Tell me you’re unaware of his achievements as president without telling me…

          • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            13
            ·
            3 months ago

            I am aware Joe Biden is complicit in Genocide and performed like a senile geriatric on CNN.

            Tell me you don’t live in America without telling me.

            • zenitsu@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              I understand it’s hard to see a whole picture when onde side of a single issue occupies 100% of your brain capacity

              • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                11
                ·
                3 months ago

                Some people find it a little hard to ignore Genocide. Good to see the average Democrat has no issue with it and willingly admits it.

                • papertowels@lemmy.one
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  9
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  3 months ago

                  Some people find it a little hard to ignore Genocide murdering babies. Good to see the average Democrat has no issue with it and willingly admits it.

                  The same logic and reasoning as conservative single issue anti-choice voters, it’s good that America is healing its divides.

        • uis@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          I would rather say appeasing to right wing voters with right wing rethoric is worthless.

    • smeenz@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      I’m not sure that anyone claimed Biden was the most popular demograt candidate ever, it’s more that he was the safe choice, and dems have always played it safe…at least until this week where they’ve finally taken a chance on something.

      • NutWrench
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Same here. When your choice is between boring, middle of the road corporatists and 100% concentrated evil, it shouldn’t be a tough choice to make.

        That doesn’t mean I’m a fan of Democrats, though. In fact, I farking HATE having to vote Democrat. I’ve hated it for the last 20 years. But I hate the Judge Dredd universe the Republicans want even more. Check out Project 2025. They’re not even trying to be subtle about what they want, anymore.

      • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        3 months ago

        Biden was not safe his polling looked horrible even before he turned out to be a walking skeleton.

        Biden was poised to lose almost all swing states to Trump in the polls. Even deep blue states suddenly turned into battlegrounds because he wants to support Genocide so badly.

        There was nothing safe about Joe Biden unless Democrats think that him winning a 1/1 elections means he has an 100% win rate indefinitely.

        • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          You’re literally arguing that Joe Biden (who is doing that he can to negotiate a cease fire) would lose to Donald Trump because voters felt Trump would care more about Palestinians than Biden?

          Not everything is about Gaza you know.

          Try to do some level of critical thinking, lest you become a single issue voter and easily manipulated into a future MAGA (fascist) movement.

          • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            3 months ago

            What is Joe Biden to negotiate a ceasefire? Send bombs for israel to throw on schools? Cover for their Genocide diplomatically?

    • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      “Opposing Israel is political suicide!” — Lemmy literally a week before the presumptive nominee told Netanyahu that the war needs to end.

      • Soggy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Ah yes, Lemmy the monolith. Lemmy the single person with a single thought. Nevermind that there are many Lemmy instances with very different user bases.

      • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Must’ve missed that quote in among the endless stream of insane “Genocide Joe” posts on here.

        • alcoholicorn
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          .world was saying “better things aren’t possible, not supporting genocide is actually a really complicated and nuanced matter”, .ml was saying “People aren’t voting for genocide joe”.

  • systemglitch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    54
    ·
    3 months ago

    I think overhyping of Harris is going to backfire, similar to what happened with Clinton in 2016.