• CommunistCuddlefish [she/her]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      5 months ago

      NYT’s business is manufacturing consent. They manufactured consent to invade Iraq. They manufactured consent for perpetual covid circulation, reinfection, and the death and disability that follow. They’ve been manufacturing consent for supporting an apartheid ethnostate in committing genocide.

      Nobody should take it seriously as a news outlet.

  • ryepunk [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    5 months ago

    NYT, such a land of contrasts. Some really good investigation pieces that expose heinous shit. And then everything else they produce being completely lib pilled or outright conservative. And then they have the 5 letter word game that they basically took out back and murdered when they bought it. They also have a crossword puzzle that is useful for exposing sickos around you.

  • GrouchyGrouse [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    5 months ago

    It’s amazing how much they got and continue to get wrong and the most vocal people raising voices about COVID and the attendant issues are the death dealing antivax chuds. Hellworld.

      • LaughingLion [any, any]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        5 months ago

        At this point I know what my COVID symptoms are. Heavy fatigue, headaches, diarrhea, aches, and a mild cough and scratchy throat. Lasts for a week.

        First time was ROUGH though. was sick for almost a month. Took like a year to recover.

    • ButtBidet [he/him]@hexbear.netOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 months ago

      Forgive me if I’m too lazy to research atm. There are multiple big waves every year. And since people rarely test nowadays, lots of infections are passed off as the flu, cold, or allergies. I’ll find something more substantial and get back to you.

  • Hugohase@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    Often, there are reasons to criticize newspapers, reporting on the current state of knowledge is none of them.

        • egg1918 [she/her]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          There were 779 hospitalizations on October 9, the highest number reported since July 15.

          From the October, 2020 section, dated October 9th.

          4 days after NYC experienced it’s highest number of cases since the summer peak that year, the New York Times published the linked article downplaying the seriousness of this life threatening pandemic.

          Are you starting to see why we are criticizing them?

          I love when libs link something they clearly haven’t read and all it does is prove them wrong.

    • Barx [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      5 months ago

      The current state of knowledge, buried deep in the article, was their own statement that nobody knew how prevalent reinfections were.

      This is after repeatedly saying it’s rare.

      Also, at a very basic level, this was in the beginning of a global pandemic where infecting rates were high, there has already been multiple waves, and and it would be literally impossible to claim that reinfection would be rare. If a new variant took over every 6 months due to waning immunity to a new set of variants, they’d never detect it.

      Applying very basic logic to the situation made this article and everyone quoted in it reckless and partly responsible for the deaths of thousands, maybe millions. It was part of a wider campaign of COVID minimization led by a press complicit in that narrative (one that aligned with capitalist interests in real estate and forcing people back to work / ending “lockdowns”) and a minority of irresponsible researchers known as “COVID minimizers” that lied through their teeth for a chance to get in the press.