• Tunnelvision [they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    5 months ago

    The other comments explain it enough I think, I’d just like to add that I think there is a natural reaction to underestimate the North Koreans even among leftists, but imho I think the DPRK would do better in a war against the US in Korea than even the Russians in Ukraine. Just for comparison sake the Russians have been practicing the war in Ukraine for 30 years pretty much, but the DPRK has been practicing since the 1950’s.

              • Rod_Blagojevic [none/use name]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                17
                ·
                5 months ago

                They keep claiming they have what they need to destroy Russia, but 2 years into the conflict, it still hasn’t shown up, and Russia is even stronger. NATO doesn’t have anything else they can part with.

              • Tunnelvision [they/them]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                13
                ·
                edit-2
                5 months ago

                It really isn’t. For nato to be well armed they would have to dump massive amounts of money into manufacturing and even then it would take years to get up to speed. We have every indication that the US has given from their own stockpiles. Not all of it, but there really isn’t old stock to speak of.

              • PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmygrad.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                13
                ·
                5 months ago

                UK admitted they have ammo for 3 weeks of warfare. German military is in shambles. French and Polish disarmed some of their units to send arms to Ukraine. US is not in such a great condition too, eating L after L from barely armed people like Taliban or Ansar Allah.
                Sure, they may be well armed but for usual aerial terror campaigns (because not even for naval now), but absolutely not for land warfare.

                  • Tunnelvision [they/them]@hexbear.net
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    9
                    ·
                    5 months ago

                    If the United States had the capacity to make enough ammunition and ordnance to fight multiple wars at the same time, there would be enough people employed by these companies that you would probably personally know at least 1 of them.

          • REEEEvolution@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            5 months ago

            That supply has long since started to dry up. All they get is below the rate at which they lose it. And they get less and less.

      • REEEEvolution@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        5 months ago

        The slow progress is very much intentional. Less casualties for Russia, more for Ukraine. The digging in also was intentional, Ukraine was very open about its planned counter offensive. Russia dug in and let them come.

        Don’t get me wrong, there have been russian fuck ups, like, after the peace negotiation broke down, not taking into consideration that many contract soldiers might not renew their contracts.

      • Rod_Blagojevic [none/use name]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        5 months ago

        It looks to me (I am not a reliable source) like Russia won the war immediately. There will never be a stable, western aligned government in Ukraine again. But there will be a huge buffer zone that keeps NATO far from anything Russia considers dangerous.