Conservative-dominated court restores books denounced by officials as ‘pornographic filth’ to school libraries

An appellate court has ruled that Texas cannot ban books from libraries simply because they mention “butt and fart” and other content which some state officials may dislike.

The fifth US circuit court of appeals issued its decision on Thursday in a 76-page majority opinion, which was written by Judge Jacques Wiener Jr and opened with a quote from American poet Walt Whitman: “The dirtiest book in all the world is the expurgated book.”

In its decision, the appellate court declared that “government actors may not remove books from a public library with the intent to deprive patrons of access to ideas with which they disagree”.

  • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    131
    ·
    7 months ago

    And these old farts are complaining about how “soft” today’s youth are? They really need to get their heads out of their butts.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      47
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      To be fair, he didn’t have to make it that long.

      On the other hand, we wouldn’t have gotten this:

      • Seven “butt and fart” books, with titles like I Broke My Butt! and Larry the Farting Leprechaun;

    • subignition@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      7 months ago

      for extra effect, I recommend reading through the opinion first before imagining. The high quality of the writing really accentuates the ludicrous degree of clown shit on display from the GOP.

    • vortic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      7 months ago

      The primary opinion is only 27 pages. The rest is a three page concurrence a 46 page dissent by Duncan.

  • vortic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    64
    ·
    7 months ago

    I think it says something that one of the books they were trying to ban was Called Themselves the K.K.K: The Birth of an American Terrorist Group by Susan Campbell Bartoletti.

    • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      47
      ·
      7 months ago

      If you look at the books that were banned and take out all the humorous ones about butts and farts, you’re left almost exclusively with books about past conservative atrocities and books about current targets of conservative bigotry.

      The people who want to ban these books were too bigoted for the 5th Circuit. They’ll probably try to close the whole library next.

  • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    The Bible describes God showing Moses his ‘backside’, which a number of actual scholars interpret as including his butt.

    Not sure about farts in the Bible, but there’s stories about rape, incest, at one point a description of men with ‘emission like donkeys’, ie, huge cum loads from big dicks.

    They seem to never learn that if you try to ban ‘pornographic’ text, you’ll have to ban the Bible as well.

    • theangryseal@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      7 months ago

      Nuh uh. I swored on the bi-bull three times. That ain’t in there. I never heard my preacher say that and all he ever talked about was the bi-bull.

  • Aganim@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    7 months ago

    Imagine being all worked up about books mentioning raging obscenities like ‘butt’ and ‘fart’, only to get slapped in the face by Judge ‘Wiener’. 😂

    • JonEFive@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 months ago

      Imagine having that much of an issue with barely offensive words that their kids will never read because most don’t use the school library anyway.

      And imagine letting your kids come home and access whatever media they want including actual pornography on the internet. Most of these parents have zero clue how to block internet sites on their home computers and laptops let alone the phones that their kids all have.

      But of course, that’s another problem some parents are asking the government to solve by forcing porn sites to require visitors to affirmatively identify themselves and their age. Of course, that only applies to the major porn sites that play by the arbitrary rules anyway. All so stupid.

  • TooManyFoods@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    7 months ago

    The desenting opinion called the court the “library police” for refusing to let the state police the library.

  • PoopDelivery@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    7 months ago

    Good. Fuck Butt Fart Texas. Books should not be censored for words. I remember a teacher in maybe 7th grade reading a book outloud with the word fuck in it, and he just said it and kept reading, he.knew the book well. I gained a lot of respect for that teacher and listened to him because I felt like he wasn’t going to censor what he taught us.

    • JonEFive@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      7 months ago

      Good teacher. Authors choose their words intentionally. I’m guessing “fudging”, “friggen”, and “ducking” (thanks iPhone) are not great replacements for the subject matter.

  • Silverseren@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    7 months ago

    Apparently terms that anyone over 12 years old doesn’t find funny anymore count as “adult”.

    Is this conservatives admitting that they are all just immature children?

  • hume_lemmy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    7 months ago

    Unfortunately, we know how this is going to go: “If you won’t let us ban books from the library, we’ll just ban the library.”

    • IamSparticles@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      7 months ago

      Already happening in some places. Local governments are cutting library funding because they don’t like the some of the content that their libraries are stocking, but the courts won’t let them ban it all.

      • bitwolf@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Time to open private non-profit libraries, offer classes on social tolerance and apply for public grants?

    • OBJECTION!
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Which was probably the intent from the start.