• USNewsJunkie@newsie.social
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    @zephyreks Here’s another one for you then. See if you can comprehend what Brigadere General Pat Ryder is saying…

    "Ryder was asked Thursday whether he believes those U.S. mitigation efforts were responsible for the balloon’s failure to gather any info.

    “Certainly, the efforts that we made contributed,” he said."

    https://abcnews.go.com/US/chinese-spy-balloon-american-made-parts-transmit-data/story?id=100476856

    • zephyreks@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Last I checked, the Pentagon falls higher on the scale of “reliable statements by government” than some random General.

      • FlowVoid
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The “random General” is the Pentagon spokesman, silly.

        You shouldn’t rely so much on secondary sources. The Pentagon, via Gen Ryder, said that the balloon carried surveillance equipment but it was not able to collect intel from the US.

        My guess is that it was no longer under Chinese control, and so the sensors were inoperable.

      • USNewsJunkie@newsie.social
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        @zephyreks dude I don’t know any other way to explain it to you so that you can comprehend it. The balloon was trying to collect information and was thwarted. You have it from a brigadier general that mitigation efforts certainly contributed to the balloon not collecting any information. You can try and act like it was just not collecting information out of the goodness of the Chinese’s heart, but that is a blatant misrepresentation of fact.