The court said that website design was a form of expression because its product was “original and custom-designed” for every customer in order to express the customer’s idea. The vast majority of restaurants and stores would not pass this test.
The “random General” is the Pentagon spokesman, silly.
You shouldn’t rely so much on secondary sources. The Pentagon, via Gen Ryder, said that the balloon carried surveillance equipment but it was not able to collect intel from the US.
My guess is that it was no longer under Chinese control, and so the sensors were inoperable.
The whole point of using a spy balloon, rather than a satellite, is that it can remain on site.
China probably meant to use this balloon to monitor somewhere near its release site, maybe Taiwan.
It was blown way off course, China lost its ability to communicate with it, it could no longer collect information, it entered unauthorized airspace, and it was (appropriately) destroyed.
It did not collect information over the US. The same source literally said that it was carrying surveillance equipment.
“We’re aware that it had intelligence collection capabilities, but it was our – and it has been our – assessment now that it did not collect while it was transiting the United States,” Ryder said during a briefing, adding, “As we said at the time, we also took steps to mitigate the potential collection efforts.”
The US does, in fact, use spy balloons.
deleted by creator
No, I mean that when you build something that looks like a spy balloon, other people will think it’s a spy balloon. They might even shoot it down.
My point is that balloons are not allowed to enter sovereign airspace without permission. And if they do, they can expect to be intercepted or destroyed.
I recently switched from horizontal to vertical to avoid stressing the bottom boxes. As a side benefit, it’s much easier to remove boxes from the shelf.
I was worried about what would happen to the contents, but if you bag all components then it’s not really an issue.
The only real disadvantage is that boxes can open by themselves if the shelf is not fully used.
There are plenty of recent examples of the SCOTUS inappropriately making up new religious rights. But this is not one of them. The court even pointed out that their decision could be used against religious expression.
For example, if a Christian asked an atheist to design a “He gets us” ad, then previously the atheist might have violated the law if he refused (since religion is a protected class). According to the new SCOTUS ruling, the atheist cannot be punished for refusing.
This ruling was not based on religion.
Basically, if your job involves messaging, then you can refuse to produce messages you don’t agree with. It doesn’t necessarily have to do with religion.
For example, suppose a Russian hired you to make a pro-Putin website. You can refuse, even if there is a state law barring discrimination by national origin.
This only applies to messaging. If the same Russian wanted to eat at your restaurant or stay in your hotel, you cannot refuse on the basis of his ethnicity.
No digging required, it’s all on the surface.
Even the headline to the original article said the balloon did not collect information. It never said the balloon did not carry surveillance equipment, you incorrectly assumed that.
US *admitted that there is no spy equipment on the balloon.
Once again, you are making things up.
The US said the spy balloon was certainly capable of spying, but it did not collect information over the US, in part because of the American response.
“We’re aware that it had intelligence collection capabilities, but it was our – and it has been our – assessment now that it did not collect while it was transiting the United States,” Ryder said during a briefing, adding, “As we said at the time, we also took steps to mitigate the potential collection efforts.”
And does it explain how air currents can add two thousand pounds of equipment to a balloon?
deleted by creator
You should read the articles before you link to them. This one describes normal weather balloons, which are far smaller than the Chinese balloons and can only travel about 100 miles.
Sure, it’s possible that China deployed a completely novel type of weather balloon. But if so, it should not be surprised by the interception of its unusual balloon when it entered US airspace.
For that matter, if you designed a brand new weather instrument that was carried in the back of a Cessna, and then you flew that Cessna into Chinese airspace to carry out your measurements, then you should expect to be intercepted and probably arrested. After all, Mathias Rust was sentenced to four years for violating Soviet airspace.
I’m afraid you are the one making things up. The article doesn’t say anything about balloons following air currents, quite the opposite:
That’s because balloons still offer unique advantages: They don’t disturb their surrounding environment, they’re very gentle on scientific instruments, they can hover in one place for extended periods of time
Normal weather balloons are far smaller and incapable of crossing an ocean. The Chinese balloon was not a normal weather balloon.
Weather balloons collect meteorological data.
Spy balloons, like this one, carry equipment for intelligence surveillance, and inconsistent with the equipment onboard weather balloons.