As I started my A Levels, I decided to take all my notes on Obsidian and sync this to a public Git repository. But why not take it a bit further? So I did, I used a lovely open-source project called Quartz to build a beautiful Hugo based static site.
Then I automated the building everytime I push a change to GitHub and make GitHub Actions spit the web files onto a seperate branch which I sync with my webserver hourly.
Its’s still a work in progress, but I am feeling good about it so far.
Apparently the lecturers claimed the site was misleading 😂 which to me is (excuse my french) a load of bullshíté, seeing as I achieved excellent results using the same notes for revision.
The meeting was in-person, they refused to provide a copy of the lecturer feedback they collected and would not let me read any of it. They seemed to read a very carefully curated selection of the multi-page report. From my sitting angle I recall noticing some positive feedback on the report, which the legal team didn’t mention during the meeting