Would be funny if Winamp gets a second life ~20 later.

  • n2burns@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    IMHO, it sounds like it’ll be “Source Available.” Especially

    Winamp will remain the owner of the software and will decide on the innovations made in the official version.

    • KISSmyOSFeddit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Would this allow a fork under a different name or would it have to be rewritten, replacing all original code, like Unix?

      • Chewy@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        If they chose an open source license, a fork under a different name would be possible (else it’s not open source).

        Their wording is ambiguous, so maybe they only talk about keeping the name/trademark to themselves, which is definitely a good choice.

        It’s also not clear if they accept contributions, but they’ll likely keep deciding what features should get added or not.

        At least that’s how I understand it.