• muzzle@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    67
    ·
    6 months ago

    Actually, it’s a lot better to dig, free radiation shield!

        • RealFknNito@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          32
          ·
          6 months ago

          Mood debuff from the game Rimworld where if you spend too long without going outside, you get a severe penalty.

          In other words, being underground for long (or indefinite) periods would probably have a profoundly negative effect on people’s moods.

          • SSTF@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            24
            ·
            6 months ago

            That’s why it is important to do sociological testing on earth first. Putting groups of humans in, let’s call them vaults, to test reactions to isolation and lack of surface contact.

            • RealFknNito@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              Yes, yes and then we do experiments on them without their knowledge to gauge how they react as opposed to control vaults. We should also name this department something fitting. Since they’re working on new technologies with vaults maybe something like… Vault-tec

          • muzzle@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            17
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            I see, what’s the mood debuf for radiation poisoning? :)

    • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 months ago

      My plan is to use concentrated sunlight to tunnel directly through an asteroid and use the material to build a small O’Neill cylinder inside. The rest of the rock would provide radiation shielding so the cylinder would be cheaper to construct, and we can send sunlight into the cylinder from either end using the same mirrors we carved the asteroid with.

  • TC_209 [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    nerd Um, acktually, we should build long-term Lunar and Martian habitats underground (lava tubes would work nicely) to protect from solar and interstellar radiation. nerd

    • jol@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      It’s so ridiculous. We can do that at home. There’s literally no point in living in Mars. No air no gravity, no radiation protection. Even if we make the air here radioactive and the water poisonous, at least there’s air and water.

      • RecluseRamble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        6 months ago

        We need that terraforming exercise to eventually leave the solar system though. Stars don’t live indefinitely. But we probably have to grow up first and try in a couple of centuries.

        • jol@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          I love space exploration for science, but living in Mars makes no sense, sorry. Even in the solar system there’s better places to settle. Heck, even venus is better.

          • Kratzkopf@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            6 months ago

            I’m on board with ‘living on Mars makes no sense’ at least until we really run out of space here, but we have much more pressing issues before that. But I doubt Venus being more suitable. The high atmospheric temperature of Venus (~460°C) is pretty harsh and it is much more easy to heat than to cool stuff down. The high pressure also makes getting there difficult with the hard entry. Mars at least has a similat rotation period to earth.

    • Mossy Feathers (She/They)@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      52
      ·
      6 months ago

      Ironically, between Venus’ earth-like gravity and high atmospheric density, it might actually be easier to build cloud colonies on Venus than ground colonies on Mars.

        • zout@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          23
          ·
          6 months ago

          Nah, we just need to crash Mercury into the surface of Venus, get the rotation sorted out and a moon going. After that, buildings.

        • Mossy Feathers (She/They)@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          6 months ago

          Yep, yet it’s my understanding that it’d be easier to colonize Venus than Mars. Venus is closer, Venus’ gravity is similar to Earth’s, the air is extremely dense which means balloons would be very effective, iirc Venus has more opportunities for inter-planetary transit, high-altitude temperatures (where the balloons would float) are more similar to Earth’s, etc.

        • steal_your_face
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          6 months ago

          Yeah what would be the benefit to colonies Venus vs just living in space? Gravity?

          • MajorHavoc@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            6 months ago

            I think the theory is that it proves that ones favorite -ism that starts with c- is objectively superior to ones least favorite -ism that starts with c-.

        • hedgehogging_the_bed@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          6 months ago

          That’s why balloons! You can have sick blimps on Venus and IIRC you can capture atmospheric gasses to burn as fuel for them and to create water too.

      • Sonori@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        The hard part would things like water and raw building materials, one of the benefits of ground is that it’s mostly iron, oxygen, and other metals, while basically everything on Venus would need to be shipped in from off world.

      • Makeitstop@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        In the long term, it’s also possible to alter the atmosphere on Venus until it’s approximately the same as Earth. It would be a massive undertaking, but a hell of a lot easier than getting Mars to a comfortably habitable state. And you could potentially get an entire habitable planet out of the deal, which would be nice.

        Kurzgesagt had an interesting video on the topic.

        Obviously it would take a significant investment of resources that would benefit some future generation, but not our own. So, back to being impossible, at least for now.

      • burgersc12@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        Right cause getting food/oxygen/water is so easy while in fucking hot air balloons.

        • Mossy Feathers (She/They)@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          They’ve come up with a way they could do it. I dunno why you’re mad about that, I was just wanting to share an interesting tidbit I’d learned.

          My understanding is that the reason why scientists like playing with the idea is that it’s more feasible than it immediately seems, and it’d solve some of the issues that a Mars colony would have (increased solar radiation due to low atmospheric density and weak electromagnetic field as well at very low gravity).

          Would it be expensive? Yeah. We’re talking about colonizing another planet though. It already is going to cost hundreds of billions if not trillions to do.

    • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      6 months ago

      I remember reading some old sci-fi that thought Venus was going to be paradise. The next earth.

      Then they found out how awful it really was.

      • burgersc12@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Yeah, lot of “Alien from venus!!” stuff. Too bad all the planets and moons are FAR from hospitable, we’d be better off fixing our own planet than trying to build a new one from scratch

        • GoofSchmoofer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          6 months ago

          Yeah but people and corporations would have to change and that’s too difficult instead we should do something easy like colonize another planet. /s

  • MBM@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 months ago

    … I don’t get this comic. Is it satirical, or is it just not saying anything?

    • OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      6 months ago

      Seems to be making the point that it would be kind of dumb to spread across the solar system just making the other planets just as messed up as what we are currently doing on Earth.

      • BluesF@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        6 months ago

        There’s not so much to mess up on, say, Mars. I mean the terrain is interesting in its way but it’s not like we’d be annihilating complex ecosystems like we are here on earth. We would have to establish significant ecosystems anywhere we settled, in fact.

        • hex@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          6 months ago

          Honestly making all our corporate bullshit buildings on other barren planets would be way better than acting like a cancer on the ecosystem on earth. If we manage to become space fairing, I hope they can restore earth and reduce our spread on it. We don’t need concrete jungles.

    • Mango@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      What is saying is that our style of life is stupid and boring compared to our ambitions. It’s why I don’t bother traveling. Little bit of different geography and I’m still just hanging out inside for comfort and amenities.

      This kind of thing is why I’m most interested in abstractions and stuff like dancing.

      • alcoholicorn
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        It’s why I don’t bother traveling. Little bit of different geography and I’m still just hanging out inside for comfort and amenities.

        Have you considered not staying at a resort/cruise ship? Like yeah I don’t understand why people who just hang out inside travel either, that’s why I don’t do that.

  • Sam_Bass@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    Most vermin on this planet reflexively build nests all over the place to accommodate population growth. Its a sickness