• zout@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      6 months ago

      Nah, we just need to crash Mercury into the surface of Venus, get the rotation sorted out and a moon going. After that, buildings.

    • Mossy Feathers (She/They)@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      6 months ago

      Yep, yet it’s my understanding that it’d be easier to colonize Venus than Mars. Venus is closer, Venus’ gravity is similar to Earth’s, the air is extremely dense which means balloons would be very effective, iirc Venus has more opportunities for inter-planetary transit, high-altitude temperatures (where the balloons would float) are more similar to Earth’s, etc.

    • steal_your_face
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 months ago

      Yeah what would be the benefit to colonies Venus vs just living in space? Gravity?

      • MajorHavoc@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 months ago

        I think the theory is that it proves that ones favorite -ism that starts with c- is objectively superior to ones least favorite -ism that starts with c-.

    • hedgehogging_the_bed@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 months ago

      That’s why balloons! You can have sick blimps on Venus and IIRC you can capture atmospheric gasses to burn as fuel for them and to create water too.