• Danksy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 months ago

    How is it wrong? First it makes some assumptions about the question and answers the typical version of the riddle. Then it answers the trivial version where there are no additional items. Seems like a complete and reasonable response to me.

    • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      GPT should’ve started with “if it’s only about a goat and a boat” instead of going through the whole goat wolf cabbage puzzle first. Now that would make it look smarter

    • Ephera
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Ah, I hadn’t read that anymore. I thought, it assumed that it was about the cabbage+wolf riddle and that would be the rest of its blathering.
      @webghost0101@sopuli.xyz