An exceptionally well explained rant that I find myself in total agreement with.

  • SK4nda1
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I agree that they should be allowed a profit. However calling it open source when redistributing rhel code causes them to hold the right of canceling you access to the code and binary, eventhough gpl states that redistributing is a right under gpl rubs me the wrong way.

      • MrPenguinSky@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not really, CentOS Stream tracks ahead of RHEL and isn’t bug for bug compatible, which is also something that Rocky and Alma wants and needs to be.

        • SK4nda1
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Jeah exactly, not all things in rhel get opstreamed or backported. They are trying to monetize rhel by making taking away the spirit of opensource.

          The thing is the people who run centos will not suddenly go for rhel at the prices they charge. Most people will just go for debian or susa