AI = 0 □
deleted by creator
(MC^2 + C√P)^2 wouldn’t give you that result though, because you have to FOIL.
Instead you’d get M^(2) C^4 + 2MC^(3)√P + PC^2
And that’s not even the correct formula. It’s
E^2 = (mc(2))2 + (pc)^2
You can’t just naively apply a square root unless one of the terms is vanishing (momentum for a stationary mass, giving E = mc^2, or rest mass for a massless particle, giving E = pc = hf).
The way to remember this is that it’s equivalent to the Pythagorean theorem, A^2 + B^2 = C^(2).
So it in fact only makes sense if AI = 0.
In my experience, when E=mc² is written, physicists generally mean relativistic mass, making the formula extract, whereas m_0 is used for rest mass, as seen in the expansion E = m_0c² + m_0v²/2 + O(v⁴)
Where does that expansion come from? As far as I can tell, m0v^(2)/2 only gives you the kinetic energy of the object where v << c, in which case the difference between relativistic mass and rest mass is negligible?
And where does the O(v^4) term come from?
This really seemed like a good simplification until you threw in that d’Alembert operator at the end
deleted by creator
Sounds like some
bullshit artistmotivational speakerProbably an AI expert too
And a Bitcoin Scholar
Bitcoiners are old-school, serious people. They highly dislike such bullshit as they have seen the entire “crypto” shitshow, and the AI bullshit is similar in many ways
Deleted
deleted by creator
Basically the same is happening to boomers, e. g. in Europe, too. Also ageism is happening here too. I don’t know, how much worse it is over on your part of the planet, but here you’re also not taken seriously when you’re young
Nothing. There is a lot of anti-asian racism going on here on Lemmy.
So you feel this is perhaps racist but no concern for it also being perhaps ageist?
Deleted
It also means AI = 0
I’ve heard about an extended version of the equation:
E2 = m2c4 + p2c2
Or E = (m2c4 + p2c2)1/2If so, AI = (m2c4 + p2c2)1/2 - mc2
I may have the capabilities to be a technology management consultant
So math is like painting, you can just arbitrarily add a splash of color somewhere to change the mood…
Well math might be, physics for sure isn’t
I feel like you are forgetting QCD, where they actually added a splash of colour to change the mood of the reader.
As I said in another thread where this was posted, that original post has the distinctive voice of ChatGPT. Could be another similar model, but I’d bet money that was written by an LLM.
How did it lose so much quality since it was posted just a week or two ago?
The ways of compression artifacts are mysterious.
😆
Deleted
yeah it reads exactly like something chatgpt would write
LinkedIn is just another Microsoft-owned account you should just delete for your sanity
!linkedinlunatics@sh.itjust.works back at it again with some more AI bs.
Ist there actually an upcomming alternative for Job profiles and stuff?
I love that’s it’s not “what are you on about?” it’s just a general what
I always found the difference between general and special whativity fascinating.
deleted by creator
It goes on like this:
What
The
Actual
F***
Is
This?
Reading this is an actual cognitive hazard.
I want to know who this idiot is.
his name is Chatgpt
I mean, the equation isn’t wrong given that AI basically becomes a rounding error and can be safely ignored.
I choose to believe he’s just looking for VC money and is not actually that stupid lol
I’d like to present the equation solution to all sandwich related crisiseseses: BLT+AI.
Bacon, Lettuce, Tomato + Avocado, Ice cream?
Worse, iceberg lettuce. If the first one is also iceberg, pass.
This reads like a post written by AI as well lol
AI+8k+5G
We need a = sign sonewhere, right?
Nope, none of this is math.
For aesthetics n ‘legitimacy’?
they did the meth right
I like how the OP’s name was censored for their privacy, but not the name of the person responding. Also, what the hell are these people huffing?
