• military neutrality
  • outlaw extreme nationalism
  • cede Crimea and part of Donbass
  • full Russian withdrawal
  • guarantor countries (🇨🇳🇺🇸🇫🇷🇬🇧🇹🇷) obliged to intervene within 3 days if Russia invades
  • kae@lemmy.caEnglish
    811·
    5 months ago

    Just be aware this poster is often posting pro-Russian, pro-China content. There’s value in other points of view and not being myopic, but if you pay attention to posting trends or look at their history, there is a clear bias and/or agenda.

      • kae@lemmy.caEnglish
        28·
        5 months ago

        I agree with you. Disagreement in views isn’t a comment about an individual themselves.

        That doesn’t change a pattern of posting and comments that are distinctly pro-Russian, pro-China.

        • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆OP
          81·
          5 months ago

          Please explain to the class why you keep trying to paint posting factual information about the state of the world nefarious.

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆OP
      106·
      5 months ago

      I love how libs always resort to smearing people instead of engaging with the actual points being made.

      • kae@lemmy.caEnglish
        38·
        5 months ago

        I enjoy how this comment seems to counter what another commenter said about you.

        It’s hardly a smear to point of a bias or perspective you hold. I’m not commenting on you, your politics, or worldview. Just pointing out that others should do their own research.

        But if that is smearing in your perspective, and that makes me a ‘lib’, alright.

        • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆OP
          91·
          5 months ago

          It’s very obvious why you made your comment and what you were trying to accomplish with it.

        • freagle@lemmygrad.mlEnglish
          6·
          5 months ago

          Your repeated comment can serve literally no other purpose than ad hominem. As in, because this poster posts things you claim to be “pro-Russia” and “pro-China” therefore the information the poster posts should be considered suspect.