News
join-lemmy.org
  • Charlie Fish@eventfrontier.comEnglish
    34·
    2 years ago

    @dessalines@lemmy.ml Thanks for the information here and all the hard work you have put into this release.

    Gotta say tho, as the maintainer of Lemmy-Swift-Client, breaking API changes like this without an API version bump, make API development within the community incredibly difficult.

    So my question to you would be, what is the purpose of having v3 in the API path, if the true test of API compatibility is the GetServerResponse version field? And breaking changes will occur in GetServerResponse version changes as opposed to the version in the API path? That doesn’t quite make sense to me.

    Would love your perspective so I can figure out how to best design the package API to accommodate client developers who might have to contend with multiple server versions.

    • DessalinesOPAEnglish
      3·
      2 years ago

      The lemmy API still hasn’t hit a version 1.0, and should very much be considered beta, with a lot of active and breaking changes. When we do stabilize it, then we can start to make these breaking API changes more solid. The v3 should probably just go away at this point, because we have too much active development and API changes to justify it.

      What we do on lemmy-js-client, which has its types auto-generated from rust, is use tags that match our lemmy release semver version.

      I’m not sure how you built lemmy-swift-client ( I hope its auto-generated from either the rust or lemmy-js-client types), but you could do the same thing: use tags to version it, then applications could use those tagged versions.

      • Charlie Fish@eventfrontier.comEnglish
        2·
        2 years ago

        Got it. That is super helpful. Really appreciate it. Sadly, I’m not doing auto-generated (yet). But it’s on my horizon for sure. I’ll work on making that a higher priority. Thanks again.

  • binwiederhier@discuss.ntfy.shEnglish
    21·
    2 years ago

    WebSockets … causing live updates to the site which many users dislike

    I appreciate all the work in this release. It’s insane how much you packed into one release. Well done. I am most excited about the live updates going away. It was quite disruptive. Thanks for that.

    That said, WebSockets can be implemented very efficiently. I run an open source notification service called ntfy, and the public instance ntfy.sh currently keeps 6-8k WebSocket connections and thousands more HTTP stream (long polling HTTP) open, all on a 2 core machine with 4GB of RAM. My point being that WebSockets can be implemented very efficiently. Though in Lemmy’s case it’s likely not necessary.

    – Another thing I wanted to notice is that I am missing mentions of security issues in the release notes. There are some tickets that sound really really really bad, like this one: https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy/issues/3060

    Isn’t that more important than anything else?

  • AlmightySnoo 🐢🇮🇱🇺🇦@lemmy.worldEnglish
    196·
    2 years ago

    I really appreciate the work that you’re doing but…

    Captchas are not available in this version, as they need to be reimplemented in a different way. They will be back in 0.18.1, so wait with upgrading if you rely on them.

    What the hell? Another bad default where newbies will continue to launch instances attracting 10k+ bot signups per day and new users will keep getting disgusted by Lemmy if they land on one of those spammy instances. Making captchas a default should have been a priority and I’m sure no one would have complained if the 0.18 release was postponed to make that happen.

    • Dr CogEnglish
      232·
      2 years ago

      The feed desperately needed a fix, so I’m glad they pushed it out. But agreed, they should be prioritizing methods to reduce spam and bots in the next release, even if they need to push out a relatively feature-sparse version first

    • leo vriska@l.60228.devEnglish
      33·
      2 years ago

      I definitely would’ve… it was basically impossible to subscribe to communities on lemmy.world and lemmy.ml from smaller instances before 0.18.0, and after lemmy.ml updated that’s no longer an issue.

  • eoli3nEnglish
    6·
    2 years ago

    The piece of content in the feed is great and much more fun to browse ! That specific change makes me feel that I can jump from reddit to lemmy definitly.

    Good work dudes <3

  • death916@lemmy.death916.xyzEnglish
    5·
    2 years ago

    I thought captcha were re enabled on the rc For this but the notes say it’s gone again. Adding one completely stopped botted sign ups for me

    • Necropola❌@lemmy.worldEnglish
      6·
      2 years ago

      Captchas have been restored by a PR shortly before release and almost immediately been removed again by reverting the PR. The PR author has been asked to re-create his PR and then 0.18.0 got released without Captchas.

  • keiko@fedia.io
    61·
    2 years ago

    All Lemmy instances on v0.18.0 are inaccessible with javascript disabled. The only way to privately browse Lemmy instances now is via kbin. I was hoping that Lemmy was going to focus more on privacy with the coming updates. Maybe this will be fixed in v0.18.1?

    #Lemmy

    • poVoq@slrpnk.net
      83·
      2 years ago

      JavaScript itself has nothing to do with privacy. I assume you think so because you are using Tor Browser at the higest security setting that disables JavaScript entirely?

      IMHO just stop using that broken-by-design browser and use a browser extension with a JavaScript allow-list.

      • oldfart@lemm.ee
        31·
        2 years ago

        It should still be possible to browse the internet with JS disabled. Especially Free Software should set a high standard to that. It’s understandable that Lemmy devs have too much on their heads now, but let’s not pretend that it’s okay to make websites which aren’t viewable without JS.

    • DessalinesOPAEnglish
      5·
      2 years ago

      Yes. We have one issue open having to do with site icons, but everything else is smooth.

    • Tugg@lemmyverse.orgEnglish
      4·
      2 years ago

      I tried to upgrade via the instructions doing a git pull and then running ansible again and it totally broke my site with a server error message. I ended up reverting back to 0.17.4.

      EDIT: It looks like they added some extra NGINX proxy stuff in there. All that broke my instance and I had previously just deployed via ansible following the instructions on their page. I would stay away for now.

      • bdonvr@thelemmy.clubEnglish
        1·
        2 years ago

        You need to manually edit the configuration after, as it will overwrite it with default values

      • bagog@lemmy.worldEnglish
        1·
        2 years ago

        Same thing happened to me. Not entirely sure why yet but debugging seems to indicate something with the pictrs config

    • binwiederhier@discuss.ntfy.shEnglish
      2·
      2 years ago

      There are multiple folks in Matrix who had issues, including myself. It only worked after using the old ansible code, but set the VERSION file to the new Lemmy version to 0.18.0. The new ansible sets up local networks in docker-compose and such that do not work and lead to Gateway Timeouts.

    • gnzl@nc.gnzl.clEnglish
      2·
      2 years ago

      I just upgraded via Ansible and the only issue I ran into is that on 0.18.0 you can’t enable Federation and Private Instance at the same time. I had both enabled on 0.17.4 and when I upgraded, the Lemmy docker wouldn’t start because both options can’t be enabled together anymore. I had to disable Private Instance directly on the database to get my instance up and running again.

  • IcarusEnglish
    3·
    2 years ago

    is the bug with “active” sorting fixed ?