fox@vlemmy.net to LinuxEnglish · 1 year agoImpact of RHEL changes to AlmaLinuxalmalinux.orgexternal-linkmessage-square18fedilinkarrow-up173arrow-down10cross-posted to: linux
arrow-up173arrow-down1external-linkImpact of RHEL changes to AlmaLinuxalmalinux.orgfox@vlemmy.net to LinuxEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square18fedilinkcross-posted to: linux
minus-squarecanpolat@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·1 year agoI think, in the short run, they are hoping some percentage of Rocky/Alma users will migrate to RHEL. I don’t believe they are really thinking about the long term.
minus-squaremeat_popsicle@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 year agoSqueeze the existing users for cash. The enterprises will just pay it. It’ll be cheaper than a migration for critical servers. Corps pull the same gameplay each time: Buy product Jack prices to the roof Kill R&D and enshittify support to minimize cost Extract profit until other products make a higher profit margin Shutdown support and repeat with a new product
minus-squarebishopolis@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 year ago But why would they want to kill their acquistion like that though? I can only recommend you look at the last decade of IBM’s history in that respect.
deleted by creator
I think, in the short run, they are hoping some percentage of Rocky/Alma users will migrate to RHEL. I don’t believe they are really thinking about the long term.
Squeeze the existing users for cash.
The enterprises will just pay it. It’ll be cheaper than a migration for critical servers.
Corps pull the same gameplay each time:
I can only recommend you look at the last decade of IBM’s history in that respect.