• empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    193
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Water and steam just too goddamn convenient. Super high latent heat so it can move a ton of energy with a quick phase change, works at reasonable pressures and temperatures, stays liquid all the time when you want it to so pumps work, and it’s so readily available as to be damn near free. Super cool!

  • Glowstick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    71
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Solar photovoltaic is the only one i can think of that isn’t just a fancy way to make steam

    EDIT

    ok let’s clarify to say a method that isn’t related to movement of a fluid that spins a turbine. So not windmills (air is a fluid), not hydro, not geothermal, etc.

    • NegativeInf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Piezoelectricity is the only other I can really think of. But it’s not like we are out here smacking crystals with hammers to make power.

      • bl_r@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 months ago

        Give buskers the acoustic guitar with a link to the grid and every time they play they’ll generate a ton of electricity (in relative terms…)

        Electro-Acoustic guitars use piezos to pick up the audio if you didn’t know

      • Glowstick@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Even if we used piezo, the movement of the hammer would still have to come from some power source, which would still be the same sources like moving steam, water, or wind.

          • skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            piezo crystal is electric motor. you input deformation of the crystal and get potential difference on opposite sides. other way around also works

              • skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                8 months ago

                it’s a special case there, because for frequencies in question mechanical quartz resonator has much higher Q than any electrical resonator you can practically build. that is, mechanical properties of piezo crystal stabilize voltage oscillations

    • Voyajer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      All power generation is either solar or ‘make thing spin’, unless we’re including RTGs and Piezoelectrics.

    • ForgotAboutDre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      8 months ago

      Hydro power uses running water not hot water.

      Squeezing can be converter to electricity with pizeo electric. Heat difference can be converted into electric directly with peltier devices. Both of these are very inefficient ways to make electricy.

    • frezik@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      The peltier effect can be used to generate electricity from a thermal gradient. It’s not very efficient, though. There’s a reason mechanical means of electrical production predominate.

    • Faresh
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      I guess aeolic energy also doesn’t use steam (unless we count the air humidity), but still involves turning a turbine.

    • Resonosity@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Aerokinetics/hydrokinetics as well. With steam, we’re creating the source fluid that turns the turbines to make electricity. Those source fluids can also exist as wind/tides/rivers naturally.

  • Rossphorus@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Some types of fusion can bypass steam generation and use what’s creatively called Direct Energy Conversion. If the fusion products are charged particles they can be passed through a magnetic field to separate them based on charge and collected onto plates. When you look at the electric potential between the plates you’ve effectively created a voltage, no steam necessary. It’s also theoretically possible to do the same with some types of fission products too.

    • Another Catgirl@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      I thought they take advantage of the velocity of the charged ions to magnetically transfer power to electromagnetic coils around the reactor.

      • Rossphorus@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        There’s a whole bunch of mechanisms, largely depending on the fusion architecture and the atoms being fused. For tokamak reactors the circular nature lends itself well to what you describe, though usually it’s energy being imparted into the ions to keep them contained and away from the walls. In the ‘standard’ deuterium-tritium fusion model (the easiest to perform) fusion produces a helium nucleus and a neutron, where the neutron gets most of the energy. Since a neutron can’t be contained by magnets it impacts the chamber walls. This heat is wicked away by, you guessed it, cooling water which turns into steam. In order to use a direct energy conversion strategy you need a fusion reaction that produces no neutrons, but we’re not there yet.

    • TheUniverseandNetworks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      generate electricity.

      not generate electricity.

      generate electricity the other way around.

      not generate electricity.

      generate electricity.

      not generate electricity.

      generate electricity the other way around.

      not generate electricity…

      Edit: I dumbly misread your post (energy/electricity) & thought of this, which I will leave here because it made me smile & that’s a good thing.

  • DessalinesA
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    /uj Steam is just an intermediary form for almost all these tho (except maybe geothermal? not sure), not the real source.

    • skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      8 months ago

      Steam just makes sense as a fluid for heat engines, thermal power plants are mostly steam, except when gas turbines are involved, but even then there’s most of the time steam bottoming cycle. (gas turbine burns something, then exhaust is hot enough to power steam cycle) Unless thermal power plant is small, then it’s more likely to be diesel engine (up to few MW). Only when it’s photovoltaics, or hydropower, or wind farm (or tidal powerplant, or some other weird ones) there’s no place for steam to be involved (solar thermal plants sometimes use steam cycle). Geothermal powerplants use steam if source is hot enough, otherwise it’s something more volatile in organic Rankine cycle

      • DessalinesA
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        I’m referring to the root energy source, rather than how it’s transferred.

        • skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          8 months ago

          Then it’s just heat transfer medium for most of geothermal powerplants too, because from what i understand, most of the time condensed water is recycled (and source of energy is just “hot rocks” anyway)

          then if you look at the bigger picture, all that energy can be traced back to either sun, nuclear fission (in reactors) or nuclear decay/primordial heat (geothermal)

    • WarmSoda@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      8 months ago

      Geothermal power still uses steam to generate electricity. It’s steams all the way down.

      • DessalinesA
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        8 months ago

        Steam isn’t the energy source tho, just a transfer mechanism.

        • Strykker@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          8 months ago

          Same for all the others like coal and nuclear though. So that’s a dumb distinction to try to make.

          Steam is always just a transfer mechanism if it’s part of the power generation

          • DessalinesA
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            Then why focus on steam specifically, why not other required intermediaries, like turbines, the storage mechanism.

            The main meaningful distinction in energy generation is the root sources of the energy, nuclear, wind, hydro, etc. All of those share similar conversion methods and intermediary forms, but have different sources.

        • WarmSoda@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 months ago

          Hence the meme. Because almost everything uses steam.

          Any other jokes you want to break down for no reason?

      • zout@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        True, but there are also solar steam systems, using a parabolic mirror to focus the sun on a steam drum.

        • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          Arguably these are even greener than photovoltaics, since they don’t require the same kinds of materials to make (mostly just steel) and last longer than photovoltaics are supposed to. They use a fair bit of water, but you probably aren’t building them in places where water is at a premium.

          • Strykker@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            8 months ago

            I mean the main steam cycle solar plants are built in dry sunny hot regions, not exactly a great source of water, but probably not completely void of it either.

      • WarmSoda@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Solar, wind, and hydro don’t use steam. (Well, hydro can bypass the steam part. It depends)

  • FreshLight@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    8 months ago

    It always produces unbelievably great memes when another person discovers how humanity generates energy from splitting atoms. I was baffled, too.

    • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 months ago

      It just makes sense. Our only way to convert electromagnetic radiation to current is photovoltaics, so solar. No way to convert alpha/beta radiation to current. So what else does fission release? Fuckload of motion. Mostly heat if it’s not as a blast, in which case it’s still mostly heat but with a pressure wave that levels cities. Heat though, heat were real good at making into electricity.