Which is just a good thing. Fragmentation has gone way too wide just to confuse the first-time users. Less projects with more working hands leads to a better solution.
The mobile linux is silly as well. 3 separate projects while none is ready. Still they all flood the aur with mobile apps.
Why there must be Cinnamon, XFCE and LxQt while they all looks 100% the same for end-user, but none supports Wayland, VRF or HDR? Those are standards which attracts first-time users than never-ending and confusing comparison between distros and DE’s.
I want to disagree with fragmentation being bad. It won’t take much to reduce the number of choices; Canonical and Ubuntu will surely be sold off to someone in 1-2 years. I would not want a few choices and then Microsoft just has to buy them and say “got you good! Bye bye Linux”.
Doesn’t this basically straight up kill distributions like Oracle Linux, Rocky Linux, Alma Linux etc.?
As I’ve understood, it’ll be just based not on RHEL, but on CentOS.
Does it? It isn’t like source code isn’t available.
Which is just a good thing. Fragmentation has gone way too wide just to confuse the first-time users. Less projects with more working hands leads to a better solution.
The mobile linux is silly as well. 3 separate projects while none is ready. Still they all flood the aur with mobile apps.
Why there must be Cinnamon, XFCE and LxQt while they all looks 100% the same for end-user, but none supports Wayland, VRF or HDR? Those are standards which attracts first-time users than never-ending and confusing comparison between distros and DE’s.
I want to disagree with fragmentation being bad. It won’t take much to reduce the number of choices; Canonical and Ubuntu will surely be sold off to someone in 1-2 years. I would not want a few choices and then Microsoft just has to buy them and say “got you good! Bye bye Linux”.