• fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        9 months ago

        *at first

        Its only cheap because its normalized in that domain. As more work is done to iron out bugs and get people in the office space the feature they need on Linux the more experience IT folks will get support.

        Its an investment as always. There is no such thing as a free lunch

        • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Society favours the short term and it will be a long time before Linux sys admins are cheaper than Windows sys admins

          Or even asking random kid out of high school how to do x

          • fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            You have too look at it at scale too, and most places should either be adopting some platform that already does or be planning on scaling some special service they do.

            Every Podunk municple probally should have to have a AD expert, a security expert, a hardware/software lifecycle management person, etc etc

            That’s how o365 can be cheaper total cost of ownership then an army of siloed sys admins, even if the software is at no cost to them.

            Its an investment in total operations of the organizations of the state, from the current state of 1990s tech most operate off of to a modern IT infrastructure.

    • extant@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Microsoft certainly tries it’s best to keep you locked into their ecosystem by making it inconvenient but not impossible to leave though that’s not the real reason, it’s security. Businesses and especially governments are scared of nation state hackers contributing malicious code to open source products and falsely assume it’s safer to use closed source software because those incidents aren’t public. There’s so much great software out there I’d love to use and the first question I’m asked when I bring it up is can you prove China hasn’t contributed code?