• unalivejoy@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              30
              ·
              8 months ago

              But Chrome, the actual application you download (as well as several forks), is closed source.

                • grue@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  24
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  But that’s not the real issue. The issue is that any Chromium-based browser – open source or not – helps Google maintain hegemony over web standards. Even if makers of other Chromium-based browsers try to maintain a fork of the rendering engine, they’ll be perpetually playing catch-up removing user-hostile misfeatures because Google controls the upstream branch.

            • Dojan@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              21
              ·
              8 months ago

              Google still has control over Chromium. Manifest v3 is a Chromium thing, not a Chrome thing. All forks of Chromium will get it and none of the browsers using Chromium as a base has moved to fork and maintain their own version of Chromium.

              This means that Google effectively has a monopoly over all browsers that aren’t WebKit or Gecko based, which is a tiny portion of all browsers. Leading to Google deciding how people access the internet. It’s already worrying that Google is the internet for a lot of people, the fact that they can do more or less anything with Chromium means that they can do whatever they want with the web standard.

              That should be a major concern for everyone. Chromium needs to be taken away from Google.

              • ulterno@lemmy.kde.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                8 months ago

                all browsers that aren’t WebKit or Gecko

                I don’t get this part. Are all engines other than those 2, based on Chromium?

                Perhaps you are forgetting Ze great Konqueror ?

                Because it has always been KHTML.

                There’s a meme for that. Check it out

                • xe3@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  I think Konquerer is no longer actively maintained.

                  Fun fact (which you may already know) the two most popular browser engines today are based on KHTML)

        • fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 months ago

          Yeah I think so.

          Their quest for a revenue stream is leading them down a dark path imo.

          I mean I get that they need money. I don’t really have a solution. I just feel very uneasy about where this is headed.

          • DahGangalang@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            I’m too lazy to cite my sources atm, so apologies in advance.

            But their deal with Google to keep Google as the default browser, they’re integration (and information sharing) with Pocket, and a large portion of the data collection the browser does by default frustrates me. Sure it’s all better than Chrome, but better doesn’t mean good, ya know?

            I personally prefer to use Firefox based browsers (Mull, LibreWolf, etc), but tend to avoid “real” Firefox where I can.

            I do have some work sites that insist on my usage of Chrome, but Brave is my solution for that. Speaking of that, does anyone know how good they (Brave) is about sticking to their privacy promises?

            • BolexForSoup@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              The google thing has been litigated a thousand times yet keeps getting repeated. Look it up, there are tons of articles explaining the relationship. It is not as cloak and dagger/nefarious as some imply.

              Brave is objectively worse than FF except at doing chromium things, which yes sometimes some of us need. I use both but FF is my daily driver.

              I recommend brave to “novices” because it’s a great foot in the door for the newly privacy-conscious, but it is not a long term solution and the head is a little sketchy.

              Both are ultimately preferable to chrome.

    • exscape@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      8 months ago

      I’m never giving it up out of principle, but I dunno about the RAM usage. Firefox was above 7GB last I looked. I have RAM to spare though, so I don’t really care.

      • Klaymore@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        There’s a Tab Discarder extension that suspends old tabs so they’re stored on the drive rather than ram.

    • NightAuthor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      8 months ago

      Damn… is this why I feel so empty inside? I’m using Firefox but no tail plug or furry action?