• shirro@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      It is a compression library that is in the dependency tree for a large number of other packages though not as many as zlib which is in practically everything.

      xz development appears to have been compromised by some organisation in a long game targeting sshd in Debian and derivatives. Debian maintainers have a nasty habit of adding lots of patches to upstream sources which occasionally have unintended consequences. I am a long term Debian user but I wish they would stop doing this. Thankfully arch generally doesn’t modify upstream as much as Debian and arch sshd doesn’t link in the backdoored library.

      • SubArcticTundra
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Ah I see. Are there any reasons why people would choose to use xz over zlib?

        • Supermariofan67@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          8 months ago

          It compresses much better, by a lot, as zlib/deflate is an ancient algorithm made back when computers only had a few megabytes of ram.

          Nowadays though, zstd seems to be replacing both of them, as at max level it compresses about as well as xz while also being faster. Nevertheless, many programs link against all the common compression algorithms (xz/zlib/zstd/bz2) to support everything