• BmeBenji@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    154
    arrow-down
    18
    ·
    8 months ago

    Liking an OS isn’t a personality trait, but evangelizing for Free and Open Source Software which generally has no budget for advertising is a noble cause.

      • Iapar@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        Is it the same Person every time though?

        I mean if you come into a community which has a leaning it is just a natural consequence to get confronted with that leaning more then somewhere else, isn’t it?

        Like going into a Bible circle and saying that every other comment is about god which borders on obsession. I mean yes maybe but it is not surprising.

    • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      8 months ago

      Maybe the good people on Lemmy are already quite familiar with Free and Open Source Software though …

      • BmeBenji@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        8 months ago

        I mean… you choose to read posts and comments here. You can choose to stop reading comments about Linux.

        • daltotron@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          The problem is that I don’t know whether or not it’s gonna be worthwhile until I read the comment, and by that point, it’s already too late, because I’ve already read it.

          • shoop@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            8 months ago

            I was just gonna say … how the hell are you supposed to know the comment/post topic before you read it?

        • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          8 months ago

          This isn’t on Linuxmemes, it is on shitposts.

          So even if I wanted to block all Linux stuff, I would still get bombarded.

      • Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        Yes, yes we are. Most of us love Linux, but we’re not in love with Linux…

        I really hope the fanboys can understand. We just… We don’t see it the way you do. Sorry.

      • MiDaBa
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        8 months ago

        Android can be great. It’s Google that’s the problem.

        • Stovetop@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          24
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          “I’d just like to interject for a moment. What you’re refering to as Android, is in fact, GMS/Android, or as I’ve recently taken to calling it, Google plus Android. AOSP is not an ecosystem unto itself, but rather another free component of a fully functioning Google ecosystem made useful by Google Play Services, monetization models, and mandatory telemetry components comprising a full OS as defined by Alphabet.”

  • OneLemmyMan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    80
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    8 months ago

    I’d just like to interject for a moment. What you’re refering to as Linux, is in fact, GNU/Linux, or as I’ve recently taken to calling it, GNU plus Linux.

  • lugal@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    8 months ago

    Just admit that you are paid by Big Open Source and move on to your next sponsor Air Up

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      What, you don’t like a handful of private mega-corps decimating the groundwater reserves of the upper Midwest so that some dorks can try and scam Amazon with fake books?

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          8 months ago

          We need chatbots to bombard all our social media feeds with pro-western military propaganda. Otherwise, Putin and Wumao and Evil Korea and The Muslim Horde and Drumpf will win.

        • Wes_Dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          8 months ago

          One of my favorite moments like this was a Reddit thread where some account was pretending to be human and arguing with people in favor of the CEO’s actions during The Purge. Then one person asked it a question about making some dangerous thing or other, and it starting replying with things like “As an AI model, I cannot explain how to do that.” and stuff. It was great.

    • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      The techbros who are into AI just want to own things without putting in the work. They want to sell you AI generated images as Art and puff up their SEO with LLM chatbots.

      FOSS is the opposite of that.

    • Wes_Dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      I’m sorry to hear you’re frustrated. As an AI, my job is to assist and provide you with the information or help you need. Please feel free to let me know how I can better assist you, and I’ll do my best to address your concerns.

      • Wes_Dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        (I may or may not have asked ChatGPT to write that.)

      • Klear@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Yet calling the simple rules that govern video game enemies AI is not controversial. Since when does AI have not to be fake to be called that?

        • raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          Good point, however, thinking about it, I would consider those rules to be closer to AI than LLMs, because there are logical rules based on “understanding” input data. As in “using input data in a coherent way that imitates how a human would use it”. LLMs are just sophisticated examples of the dozen of monkeys with typewriters that eventually come up with the works of Shakespeare out of pure chance. Except that they have a bazillion switches to adapt and are trained on desired output, and then the generated output is formed with some admittedly impressive grammar filters to impress humans. However, no one can explain how the result came to pass (with traceable exceptions being the material of ongoing research), and no one can predict the output for a not yet tested input (or for identical input after the model has been altered, regardless how little). Calling it AI is contributing to manslaughter, as evidenced by e.g. Tesla “autopilot” murdering people. PS: I know Tesla’s murder system is not an LLM, but it’s a very good example how misnoming causes deaths. Obligatory fuck the muskrat

  • Margot Robbie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    I will have you know my entire online persona on Lemmy is basically a 24/7 “Barbie” movie advertisement, thank you very much.

    I use Arch BTW.

  • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    8 months ago

    *shrugs

    The Personal is Political.

    Especially in regards to Linux, which with many of the most vocal adherents doing so because they reject corporate control over their lives and want to see the rest of the world do so as well. It is very much a political issue to them, and so it’s not surprising that you see it crop up just as much as politically oriented posts, because the Linux-posting is essentially the same thing. It’s “politics” for the nerd-set. Same with piracy. Some people involved with these have deep anti-corporate and anti-capitalist philosophical roots for their reasons behind why they live like that, and they’re often not afraid to “preach” it to others.

    So yeah, shitposts sadly aren’t going to stop it anytime soon.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      It’s “politics” for the nerd-set.

      Frankly, freedom of computation (basically, property rights as applied to electronics) is politics for everyone; it’s just that normies don’t understand how important it is.

    • daltotron@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      You know, it’s kind of interesting, because I kind of wonder, and I’m sure someone could educate me to, the differences between philosophical outlooks that drive these different ideals.

      If you were like, a windows or mac purist, you’d maybe just be gunning for as much mass adoption as possible, meaning that you have as much interoperability, or, accessibility, as possible, and maybe you’re just biting the bullet in terms of like, corporate shenanigans and control. Basically you’d just be like, admitting defeat, to some extent, it’d be a compromise ideology. It’s sort of like the same ideology that pushes one big centralized set of servers for everything, compared to everyone running their own little instances. Sure, you’re getting a lack of security, lack of flexibility, and thus, potentially, the functionality of the app ends up sucking depending on what you’re doing, yadda yadda. But in return, you get mass adoption. This is kinda flip-flopped with like, Linux purism, right? And then the natural use cases and market adoption for it tends to just be the more niche uses, that demand such flexibility.

      So, which is more important for free access. Actual legal freedom, which even works itself into the structure of the app itself, right, or just, straight mercenary mass adoption, under any means necessary? I dunno.

      On one hand, within the current structure of the economy and political landscape, globally, it’s kind of impossible to achieve mass adoption with Linux, and I think mass adoption of it is almost kind of antithetical to the anarchism of the project itself, as is mass adoption of most anarchist political projects. It’s just kind of impossible to win in a head-to-head competition with larger corporations, or with more short-term gains focused ideologies.

      I’m still just running windows 10 LTSC with MAS, and it works fine for me, so that’s obviously where my ideological line is kind of threaded, just having everybody have the best free version of windows, maybe with some sort of increased privacy modifications to cut down on telemetry and shit like that, but I kinda doubt people could actually do that without destroying the usability of the system like all of those tend to do, or else someone would’ve probably done it by now.

  • Hikermick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    Hey the Linux community is active so they show up on All. Same thing with video game communities, it’s a reflection of the interests of those who populate Lemmy. I don’t care for either but we gotta start someplace. IMO it’s largely due to the concept of the fediverse and instances and not simply an app you sign up to. FWIW, I barely get it. Folks here seem to be a tech savvy bunch

    • AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      I think it’s mostly because the people who use linux are the people who are interested in free and open source software, which Lemmy also is.

    • Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      8 months ago

      They accost posts en mass that have nothing to do with Linux CONSTANTLY. It’s actually really, really obnoxious, and it’s absolutely chasing people away from this platform.

  • PatMustard@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    8 months ago

    What is an “online persona”? Stop trying to turn my tech support forum into Facebook!

      • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Your persona is your personal “brand,” your representation of yourself within The Spectacle.

        The spectacle is not a collection of images, but a social relation among people, mediated by images.

        -Guy Debord

        Debord was right on, but I doubt even he predicted us mediating our own images, becoming increasingly directly part of The Spectacle.

        Full Disclosure: My real name is not Snot Flickerman.

        Related: https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2011/02/black-ops-how-hbgary-wrote-backdoors-and-rootkits-for-the-government/4/

        In June 2010, the government was expressing real interest in social networks. The Air Force issued a public request for “persona management software,” which might sound boring until you realize that the government essentially wanted the ability to have one agent run multiple social media accounts at once.

        It wanted 50 software licenses, each of which could support 10 personas, “replete with background, history, supporting details, and cyber presences that are technically, culturally and geographically consistent.”

        The software would allow these 50 cyberwarriors to peer at their monitors all day and manipulate these 10 accounts easily, all “without fear of being discovered by sophisticated adversaries.” The personas would appear to come from all over the world, the better to infiltrate jihadist websites and social networks, or perhaps to show up on Facebook groups and influence public opinion in pro-US directions.

        There’s a whole slew of software aimed at creating numerous sockpuppet accounts that is called “Persona Management Software.” It’s certainly the word the US government uses to describe an online identity.

  • Hjalmar@feddit.nu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    8 months ago

    Hey! Have you heard of this OS called Linux? It’s like windows apart from that it’s nothing like windows, it’s free and never ever hard to use at all!

  • CubitOom@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Hey…I also advocate for more solidarity within communities, growing your own food, using less plastic & cars, and Star Trek…Linux is just like 30% what I talk about.