anonymity and privacy seem to come at odds with a social platform’s ability to moderate content and control spam.

If users have sufficient privacy and anonymity, then they can simply use another identity to come back, or use multiple identities.

Are there ways around this? It seems that any method of ensuring that a banned user is kept off the platform would necessitate the platform knowing information about the user and their identity

  • 0xCAFe@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve read that the most healthy discussions arise with stable pseudonyms. That allows users to be “anonym”, i.e. they don’t have to use their personal name and identity, but since they have a recognizable name there’s still reputation involved which prevents a too free-for-all-ish culture.

    • CyclohexaneOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I agree that this is good, but depending on your threat model, this may not really be sufficient anonymity.

      Post and comment history may be plenty to identify you, and your IP and other personal data can still be visible to instance admins.