Appimages totally suck, because many developers think they were a real packaging format and support them exclusively.
Their use case is tiny, and in 99% of cases Flatpak is just better.
I could not find a single post or article about all the problems they have, so I wrote this.
This is not about shaming open source contributors. But Appimages are obviously broken, pretty badly maintained, while organizations/companies like Balena, Nextcloud etc. don’t seem to get that.
Some of these apps can’t work as flatpaks at all, because they require more access to the system, e.g. Davinci Resolve. AppImage allows that. I mean, heck, even Ubuntu runs a virtual filesystem in order to allow its Snap Firefox to access the Dictionary that lives “outside” its sandboxing. So, yes, there are cases where AppImages do serve a purpose. Not most cases, but a lot of cases.
afaik, you can allow more system access to flatpaks
i believe flatpak also does that, you can specify some paths from the host to be available to the flatpak
Are these access problems not solvable with XDG portals?
Have a look at GPU screen recorder, I think thats as much privileges as you need.
XDG-desktop portals are not yet complete. But for filesystem access and GPU de/encoding that should already work.
If the Davinci Resolve devs actually cared about Linux…
Have a look at GPU screen recorder, I think thats as much privileges as you need.
XDG-desktop portals are not yet complete. But for filesystem access and GPU de/encoding that should already work.
If the Davinci Resolve devs actually cared about Linux… I think the best way to run it is using uBlues image on Podman.