markus99@lemmy.world to Linux · 10 months agoLinux hits 4% on the desktop 🐧 📈gs.statcounter.comexternal-linkmessage-square235fedilinkarrow-up1981arrow-down119cross-posted to: linux@programming.devtechnology@lemmy.worldtechnologylinux_gaming@lemmy.worldlinux_gaminglinuxlinuxlinux_gaming@lemmy.worldlinux_gaming
arrow-up1962arrow-down1external-linkLinux hits 4% on the desktop 🐧 📈gs.statcounter.commarkus99@lemmy.world to Linux · 10 months agomessage-square235fedilinkcross-posted to: linux@programming.devtechnology@lemmy.worldtechnologylinux_gaming@lemmy.worldlinux_gaminglinuxlinuxlinux_gaming@lemmy.worldlinux_gaming
minus-squarePossibly linux@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·10 months agoAnd brand new $12k CPUs
minus-squareTrainguyrom@reddthat.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·10 months agoI think I saw somewhere that Windows still has scheduled bugs with high core count CPUs so you can legitimately get better performance from Linux because the scheduler has already been optimized for high core count servers
And brand new $12k CPUs
I think I saw somewhere that Windows still has scheduled bugs with high core count CPUs so you can legitimately get better performance from Linux because the scheduler has already been optimized for high core count servers