The “revolutionary” air-breathing engine could, in theory, lift an aircraft from a runway to more than 30km (18.6 miles) into the stratosphere and continuously accelerate it to 16 times the speed of sound.

At this velocity, even the longest intercontinental flights could take just one or two hours while consuming less fuel compared with conventional jet engines.

(Read full article using https://www.removepaywall.com)

  • Rosco
    link
    fedilink
    47
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    I’ll wait until other countries validate the findings, or until someone makes a working prototype, before getting excited. Seems like it’s one of those “too good to be true” stories like the LK-99. Hype in tech and science almost always leads to disappointment.

  • @huginn@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    362 months ago

    This article is bullshit: they’re reporting that a blueprint was made. No demonstration, no proof of it working.

    Rotary detonation isn’t a new concept and GE has demonstrated a rotary detonation scramjet for 0 - Mach 5.

    https://www.geaerospace.com/press-release/other-news-information/ge-aerospace-demonstrates-hypersonic-dual-mode-ramjet-rotating

    If you really think that 0 to Mach 16 is within reach with current technology RDEs I have a bridge to sell you.

    Darpa has all the money of God and they’ve been throwing billions at the exact problem of rotary detonation. Everybody knows that detonation is more fuel efficient than deflagration and that turbine engines are holding jet aircraft back from hypersonic flight.

    When they make a Mach 16 demonstrator I’ll believe them. Until then I’m still very excited for the demonstrated and actual capabilities of RDE Scramjets.

  • Norgur
    link
    fedilink
    352 months ago

    Yeah, no. Just no. Absolutely no. Faster than everything else.and higher than everything else and all of that by burning less energy? Come on people, stop falling for this kind of crap.

  • @cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    162 months ago

    If that engine actually works, it would be cool to see it on a space plane. Mach 16 is nearly 2/3rds of orbital velocity. If you could go that fast on an air breathing engine, you wouldn’t need to carry nearly as much oxygen to get into LEO.

    • @viking@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      42 months ago

      You need to draw the line between a country’s government and some of its brightest minds. This is a scientific breakthrough, and should be celebrated as such. Period.

        • @viking@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          142 months ago

          The research has been published. Everybody in the world is free to replicate it. The CCP is no more or less capable of doing so, just because it happened on their turf.

          • Kbin_space_program
            link
            fedilink
            32 months ago

            It has been published, but a staggering number of scientific “papers” coming out of China are turning out to be complete fabrications.

            • @viking@infosec.pub
              link
              fedilink
              32 months ago

              Correct, so it should be independently reviewed and recreated to validate the claims. Crying wolf just because there were issues before wouldn’t be fair.

                • @viking@infosec.pub
                  link
                  fedilink
                  12 months ago

                  Not when it comes to scientific research.

                  If the same person or someone acting under the same supervisor in the same faculty published some more amazing sounding research after previous ones had been debunked, I’d be sceptical.

                  But in a country with 1.4bn people and more than 3.000 universities? There’s gotta be some bad eggs, but you can’t discredit every single one due to the actions of a few.

                  I’ve met brilliant scientists in and from China.

        • @ZerushOP
          link
          22 months ago

          Most of these inventions will be used by military first, in China as also in the USA, which isn’t an atom better in this and other aspect. It’s precisely the USA which use more investment in weapons and defense as any other country and not precisely for humanity reasons.