I would prefer something based on Debian, like Ubuntu or PopOS, but I’m open for other suggestions as well, as I’m looking for a distro to daily-drive on my new Framework laptop.

  • Alatain@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Gotcha. For those that are happy with the upgrade process and stability of what they are on though, is there anything that makes it more enticing?

    I may end up giving it a go just to round out my experience with the various flavors and get some real experience with RPM.

    • Luca@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Honestly, Linux is Linux. Once you’re comfortable enough, that’s really all that differentiates distros between each other. (Minus weird shit like glibc vs musl, nixOS, etc) It’s just been the closest experience I’ve had to “it just works” when it comes to Linux desktop.

      I should also shout out that Fedora tends to embrace existing standards rather than make their own (cough Cannonical cough Snap). I’m also a big fan of some Fedora projects, particularly Fedora Silverblue

    • winety@dataterm.digital
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Here are my two eurocents:

      • Fedora Workstation, the main spin of Fedora which uses Gnome, is a very polished experience. I’d use it, if I were a fan of Gnome.
      • Fedora Silverblue is an “immutable desktop”, i.e. the operating system is read-only while all user applications isolated from it via flatpaks. It is supposed to make the system more secure, stable, easier to update etc. It’s a cool idea, but I haven’t tried it myself.

      Other than that? Not much. As you probably know, most distributions feel pretty much the same, Fedora included.