I replied to thread from Linus Torvalds and agreed with what he said but added my opinion which was not hate or rejection (literally) https://lemmy.ml/comment/477089 (ask for a revert)

My response to a mod (not committed in order to be able to post this thread)

They even removed my upvoted comment about a ChatGPT’s response regarding question “Is disagreeing is hating?” i was going to share again with this person Arthur: https://lemmy.ml/comment/445401

This is a pathetic move and so low compared to what the extreme you’re criticizing could do, at least them, are honest in their stupidity.

Dessalines posted https://lemmy.ml/post/1140303 “Be respectful…” my twist is “…as long as you agree with us”.

One thing for sure, you are not serving your cause. BUT, I won’t be a hater, I definitely won’t be your supporter!

  • AdaEnglish
    9•1 year ago

    There are instances that will respect your right to “disagree” with vulnerable minorities more than they value protecting those minorities. If you go and join one of those, you can find people that think like you, and the rest of us can defederate from you

    • @TheBelgianOPEnglish
      -3•11 months ago

      you are making them vulnerable by considering they can’t stand by themselves. Again I never attacked them but you can’t see that as there’s no track of my comments.

  • ghost_laptopEnglish
    8•1 year ago

    If you are communicating your thoughts in an incorrect way, ChatGPT is going to give you replies to things you are not asking. You are not “disagreeing”, assuming I know where you go with this, you are denying one’s personality which because you consider it not valid, which is essentially discrimination, since you are not one to decide what other person is. Disagreeing is saying that I like coffee and you saying it tastes like muddy water, not that certain quality of my being isn’t true or valid.

  • @pancakeEnglish
    3•1 year ago

    I understand the frustration, but each instance has its own moderation rules. The mods are just trying to keep the discourse enjoyable and civil, and what they understand by that is not the same for all instances. I like it in here, but you might enjoy some other instance that is more permissive, maybe?