• God@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Ah. Well I’m pro theft so just use it and close it if you want and pray for the best! Hide the evidence to not get sued.

    • lntl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      This happens from time to time. The offending party either removes the GPL code or they GPL the work. That’s life ;)

        • lntl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It costs money to rewrite entire libraries

          • God@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            You don’t need to rewrite it though. Just keep it closed source and import / copy paste whatever you want into your repo.

            • lntl
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              It’s may be possible to tell if there is GPL code included whether or not the source is reveal. A simple example is that some plain-text strings are visible in compiled binaries. In this way, poking around with a hexeditor may reveal strings which indicate part of the code is GPL.

              • God@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Hmmm. Thankfully I only develop small services and haven’t done any big monolith that people wanna audit. When I get to that point I’ll prolly get sued and then try to figure out what to do while profusely apologizing and denying at the same time.