The measure to make vehicles weighing 1.6 tons and over pay 3x the parking rates for the first two hours has passed in Paris.

Now, let’s get that in place for London and many other other places to help slow, and even reverse, this trend towards massive personal vehicles.

  • wopazoo [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    Please show me the mythical poor people who are driving around downtown Paris in their SUVs. Please, show me one! They don’t exist! Please stop pearl clutching over the plight of the mythical poor Parisian SUV driver!

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      And more straw manning. Props for working hard to twist what I say to fit the argument you want to argue against champ.

      • wopazoo [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        You have got to be American right? The right for one to drive their big-ass SUV downtown is not something the Parisian working-class is concerned about!

        Working-class Parisians are not buying and driving big-ass SUVs downtown anyways! No poor people are being harmed by this!

        • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          10 months ago

          I’m not an American, but it’s pretty funny how you now speak for the Parisian working class. And I’ve repeatedly explained to you in detail that my argument absolutely nothing to do with poor people being harmed by this. The fact that you keep framing it that way illustrates that you’re either a troll or have incredibly poor reading comprehension.

          • wopazoo [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            So what’s your argument then? You’re against a tax on people publicly flaunting their wealth, because it will… prevent poor people from flaunting their wealth? Lmao? Wealth that poor people don’t have?

            • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              10 months ago

              I explained my argument repeatedly in this thread, if you still don’t get it then I clearly won’t be able to explain it to you. Either I have extremely poor communication skills or you understand what I’m saying perfectly well, and choose to ignore it and make transparent straw man to argue against. Either way, you can enjoy trolling somebody else. I’m done here.