“It’s almost a cruel joke on the electorate that the longest presidential election potentially ever might also be the one that they’re least excited about,” said one Democratic pollster, speaking anonymously to candidly discuss the race.

  • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    62
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    5 months ago

    Well, here’s your problem.

    Republicans, by and large, want Trump.

    Democratic voters, by and large, want to make sure that Trump loses (much like the person he is), and would like any candidate that can offer a high probability of that happening. Biden has already beat Trump once, and has, overall, been a pretty decent president. (Yes, the Israel thing is a mess, I know. From the river to the sea, etc.) Dems might prefer a younger candidate that’s better at ramming legislation through–which no Dem could do right now, not with Republicans controlling the House–but preventing a Republican victory is more important.

    So that’s how we’ve arrived here.

    • El Barto@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      5 months ago

      Bernie would be better. But we already know what the old establishment dems think of him.

      • hydrospanner@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        Sanders, while I love the guy, is a more polarizing figure than Biden.

        Biden was pretty much always going to be the nominee in 2020 for that reason: he was never anybody’s favorite, but he was the one face in that field with the important distinction that while nobody really super liked him, nobody really hated him either. Cast a wide net, big tent, and all that.

        While the people who like Sanders really like him, there are also a lot of people who would vote Biden to block Trump for whom being asked to vote for Sanders would be a bridge too far. Not that they’d vote for Trump instead…but they just wouldn’t cast a vote for either main party candidate.

        …which of course also segues neatly to the fact that Sanders isn’t a Democrat, and asking the DNC to nominate someone who’s not even a party member is a big ask anyway.

        • hark@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          5 months ago

          If Sanders is a polarizing figure, it’s because democrats (and republicans, obviously) paint him that way because his policies diaagree with their donors. In reality, Sanders’ policies align with the vast majority of Americans, but there’s no way that’ll be allowed through our bought-out election system.

        • Alien Nathan Edward@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          nobody really super liked him, nobody really hated him either.

          I feel like this is indicative of a general shift in the electorate in America. It’s hard to be someone that most people like. It’s really easy to make most people hate the other guy and then just not be him. In 2016 Clinton tried this with the pied piper strategy, but Trump did a better job of it. People know Hillary, and they don’t like her. They didn’t know Trump at the time, and I personally know some Bernie voters who went for Trump just because “He’s not just another politician, we need a change.” In 2018, 2020, and 2022, name recognition hurt Trump and the GOP. Democrats successfully positioned themselves as the people you vote for if you don’t like Donald Trump, and they succeeded by a comfortable margin in 2018 and 2020. 2022, historically speaking, should have been an absolute bloodbath for Dems but Trump’s polarizing dickishness drove democratic voter turnout and the GOP failed to take control of the Senate and took such a narrow majority in the house that they’ve been basically non-functional since then. In 2023 Glenn Youngkin was thinking about what a GOP-controlled legislature in Virginia would do for his presidential chances and then Dems overperformed again and now he’s not even in the presidential picture and his agenda is being thwarted at every turn.

          Now it’s 2024 and each candidate is running on a platform that boils down to “vote for me, I’m not that guy that you hate and fear”. It’ll be interesting to see how it works out, and by interesting I mean that as a queer person I’m terrified because of all the violence.

      • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        Against Trump? Probably not. Republicans and independents that lean Republican view Sanders as a communist, which is generally a bad thing. (Sanders is more a democratic socialist, which is generally a positive thing.)

        • Cowbee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          Sanders is more SocDem by policy, but I think any reasonable Socialist is a Communist as well, just with vastly different time frames for achieving Communism. The ideal of a Stateless, Classless, Moneyless society is a noble goal, whether that be in 50 years, 500 years, or 5000 years.

          • El Barto@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            Nah, I don’t think Sanders wants actual communism. More power to the people and more corporate accountability, sure.

            There are countries that already do this successfully. Don’t you remember how Republicans were saying “Sanders?! Do we want to be another Sweden?!”?

            • Cowbee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              5 months ago

              I am not saying he’s a Communist, rather, I’m saying he’s not really a Socialist and just a Social Democrat, like Sweden.

              • El Barto@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                5 months ago

                I understand what you meant, then. Apologies, I’m an ignorant in terms of those types of definitions. When I read:

                Sanders is more SocDem by policy, but I think any reasonable Socialist is a Communist as well, [etc]

                I thought “being a SocDem” and “being a Socialist” were the same thing.

                • Cowbee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  It’s an easy and common misconception! Social Democrats believe in Capitalism with strong safety nets, while Democratic Socialists believe in Socialism as the form of economic structure instead of Capitalism.

    • Nudding@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      27
      ·
      5 months ago

      What I don’t see talked about much is the record breaking oil extraction done under the Biden administration.

      • chuckleslord@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Is record breaking oil extraction actually news? Isn’t that a record we’ve been consistently breaking since fraking was discovered? I feel like it’s more “Oh shit, the money machine might be turned off soon, best run that shit as fast as we can until then” from oil execs rather than “I, as Supreme Commander of the United States, demand more oil be extracted”

        • Nudding@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          16
          ·
          5 months ago

          I’d say it’s news, as it’s directly tied to the ongoing climate apocalypse.

          • chuckleslord@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            13
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            Yeah, but the point is that Biden is neither the cause nor culprit behind the record breaking, so why put it on him?

            • Nudding@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              18
              ·
              5 months ago

              I mean if you think the fossil fuel companies don’t have close ties to whatever administration is in power, I’ve got some bad news.

              • El Barto@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                15
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                5 months ago

                Still missing the point. You’re trying to pin it on Biden as if the record-breaking thing is a direct consequence of Biden being Biden - and “Biden bad.”

                No. If Trump, Zombie Kennedy, Jesus Christ or even freaking Al Gore were in power right now, the “record breaking” thing would have still happened.

              • Alien Nathan Edward@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                5 months ago

                to whatever administration is in power

                then by your own admission this is lost regardless of who’s in power and we need to look at where the candidates stand on other issues, such as Trump and the GOP being completely against renewable energy in any form and looking to defund the EPA

  • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    This election started in November 2022, because the media wants to milk as much money as possible from both rage bait and fear mongering.

  • Nobody@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    5 months ago

    And yet, democracy itself is on the ballot. I don’t want Joe Biden to be my nominee, but I also realize that Trump is the absolute collapse of America. It’s letting our basest instincts and lesser demons overcome the promise of what we could be.

    I don’t care that he’s old and moderate and held dumbass positions in the past. Biden is what is standing between order and chaos. Stability and collapse.

    One candidate openly supports lawlessness and fascism for his own personal gain. The other is an old yellow dog Democrat who governs from the center right. It sucks, but the right thing is showing up for Biden IF you vote in a swing state.

    If you don’t vote in a swing state, vote hard down ballot, then do whatever for president. It doesn’t really matter.

  • Sanctus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    I’m gonna be honest, this shit is too noisy. I am exhausted by all of this. On top of it all, these fucks make more money in 5 minutes than I will slaving my life away. I hate politics. I hate bribery codified into law. I know it would be worse for everyone if this whole thing imploded but sometimes it feels like that would be a win. Because then maybe some of these fucks that don’t realize or care we all have to share the same pie would be forced to take what has been alloted to me all these years. Am I saying I’d rather us all be in the dregs like rats? Probably not, but I think a healthy thing for a society to do is to not allow people to indirectly harm others by claiming a far bigger piece of the global pie than them and their ilk could ever remotely finish.

    • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      The problem with implosion is that it’s people like you and I that get hurt, and implosion doesn’t guarantee a sane outcome. To the contrary, countries that have major upheavals generally end up with authoritarians and dictators in power rather than easing into a stable democracy. The rich guys that remain take even more power and wealth. They’re even more untouchable.

      The only kind of major upset that would effect real change would literally be to kill off the rich and powerful, especially the extremists. Otherwise it’s a long, difficult slog to possibly, if you’re lucky, change the system via democratic means.

    • dragontamer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Nikki Haley is still running. Good grief people… There are 48 primaries left to go. If Republicans want someone else they can still choose Haley.

        • dragontamer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          There’s a chance Donald Trump gets disqualified and Nikki Haley is the only reasonable choice. There’s also a chance that Donald Trump’s shit mouth proves that he’s unfit for office the more he talks. He’s seriously not all there anymore.

          Nikki Haley staying in the race is a big part of that. Just a few weeks ago Donald Trump confused her with Nancy Pelosi. The dude’s fully a dumbass at this point and is unable to keep his arguments or rhetoric straight anymore. I think people are sleeping on what Nikki Haley could seriously accomplish here. If Nikki Haley pushes Trump to rage against her and publicly prove how much of a dumbass he is, Nikki Haley’s got a good chance.

          A lot of Republicans are going with Trump because they think they have no other option. Biden/Democrats are also pushing Trump as their opponent because someone like Nikki is the most problematic for them. So yeah, its an uphill battle, but one that I personally support.

          • chuckleslord@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            There’s a chance Donald Trump gets disqualified

            Yeah, and there’s a chance I win the Powerball even though I don’t play. Don’t think it’s going to happen though.

      • eestileib@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        5 months ago

        She is not going to win a single state. Her shot was NH. She is getting buried in the state where she won the governor’s race; after she loses there, I can’t imagine she’ll keep getting funded.

        The republican party will split before they abandon Trump.

  • spider@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    They also want a cease-fire in Gaza, but once again, The Big Club doesn’t care.

  • Bwaz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 months ago

    I dunno. These articles strike me as right wing misinfo. I’m VERY excited that Trump NOT get elected again. That wouldn’t matter even if he were running against Homer Simpson.

  • HubertManne@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    forgive me if im wrong but hasn’t trump only won two of the smaller states in the union. What the heck is wrong with nowadays. No canidate of the past would be talked about like they were the one who was not the sitting president.