- X users are complaining about an influx of low-quality ads promoting crypto scams and AI “undressing” apps.
- The decline in reputable advertisers on X has made the platform more reliant on less reputable ad buyers.
- The exodus of advertisers, partially due to Elon Musk’s controversial behavior, has left X with a growing revenue gap.
Archive link: https://archive.ph/sbOxS
404 Media report[ed] last month that ads promoting “semen stealing” were showing up on the site.
Wait what now
I wanted to see what kind of ads that might actually be since I have zero concept. I do not recommend typing “semen stealing” into Google innocently and hoping for an answer.
I’m going to have some weird ads now…
And yet you didn’t share the info with us? Shame on you
You’re welcome to weird up your ads, also.
If you don’t want to search it up, here are the first 3 DuckDuckGo results for “semen stealing”
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forced_fatherhood
https://news.yahoo.com/spurgling-stealing-sperm-pregnant-121820779.html
https://www.refinery29.com/en-gb/2022/01/10831906/baby-trapping-illegal
Here’s the summary for the wikipedia article you mentioned in your comment:
Forced fatherhood or imposed paternity, occurs when a man’s semen is used, against his will or without his knowledge or consent, to inseminate a woman, it includes deception by a partner about their ability to get pregnant or use of contraceptives, birth control sabotage, and sexual assaults of males that result in pregnancy. “Sperm theft” (also known as “unauthorized use of sperm”, “spermjacking” or “spurgling” (a portmanteau of sperm and burgling), refers to a specific form of forced fatherhood where a males semen is collected without his consent. Although the term uses the word “theft”, it more closely falls under a state of fraud or breach of contract. Stealing of sperm in itself without using it for successful insemination is not illegal and is difficult to prove. It usually has no bearing on issues like child support.
Say what now? Stealing sperm isn’t illegal unless you use it?
I saw… that. But what could someone advertise about it! And that’s a curiosity those links don’t answer…
I like how you’re just adbaiting us at this point
Entirely by accident I assure you.
Yea this guy is the hero of the thread, I would have just not bothered with the article if it wasn’t for you pointing that line out
Couldn’t find that username or email is my favourite person!
Yep, I’ve seen that, along with ads for “jack-off pants”:
Well he told advertisers to fuck off so they did.
To me as an average Joe it seems pretty dumb to tell your advertisers to fuck off when they provide a big chunk of your income but hey, I’m not a stable genius billionaire so I just don’t get Elon’s 5D chess moves. Right?
What’s much more interesting to me is when Facebook and YouTube told advertiser’s to fuck off? Because it’s the exact same type of ads but people pretend they see Disney and coca cola ads on everything except twitter…
deleted by creator
Max? Is that you?
I’m calling it now. Even if his aim was to not destroy Twitter from the inside, he will absolutely say that was his goal when it eventually happens.
People like this never, pathologically, ever, ever admit making a mistake.
He has too much money to give a shit, he lost more money than anyone has literally ever on this deal and he still has more money than almost anyone who’s ever lived. Only way he stops being like this is if he drops dead from the inevitable overdose he’s queuing up for himself
Eh most of that “money” is actually leveraged Tesla shares. Tesla shares that are overvalued. If he runs Tesla into the ground it’s not actually implausible he goes bankrupt.
Of course for the billionaires “going bankrupt” isn’t the same as it is for you an me. He’ll still live a life of luxury we can’t even imagine, he just won’t control as much of the economy as he does now. And he can always scam his true believers out of some money by creating a startup promising to to build robot dolphins or whatever (it doesn’t matter he’s a hype man) which he’ll never deliver and idiots will throw money at him.
Even if his aim was to not destroy Twitter from the inside, he will absolutely say that was his goal when it eventually happens.
Could that open him up to lawsuits from investors?
His investors wanted this. Twitter was a huge threat to a few oil rich autocratic regimes.
ooh, juicy accusation
Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Larry Ellison (Oracle) were the biggest backers in the buy out deal. Saudi Arabia’s princes want to keep a tight control on information - remember how they butchered Khashoggi? With Qatar it was probably to prevent any slave labor deaths associated with FIFA from going viral. Larry Ellison probably just wanted all that juicy data, idk, he’s quiet but he gives a lot of money to right wing American causes.
Doesn’t mean they won’t sue.
he owns Twitter
At that point, he could just deactivate the entire platform
I though Twitter is publicly traded and has stocks? That would mean that he definitely has a duty towards investors who bought the shares to lead the company in a responsible way, and if he claimed that he destroyed it on purpose, it should lead to a lawsuit from them. But I ain’t no lawyer, only vaguely remember hearing something like that. Or does he own 100% of the shares himself and is the sole investor?
It used to be publicly traded, but it went private when he acquired it.
Which doesn’t mean he doesn’t answer to any investors anymore, of course. He got quite a lot of assistance with that acquisition.
Oh, I see. I guess that means there’s basically no-one who can sue him, if there aren’t any investors.
As long as he can repay any loans and stuff, then I suppose he can do whatever he wants with the company. If, however, he bancrupts it to the point of not being able to pay back anything the company owes, then he should be in trouble. I hope.
Fafaik he bought 100% of the shares.
Weird, this week they’re also claiming that TwitX has 24 times the engaged users of YouTube.
Prime example of “source? trust me bro”. Elon can make up whatever metrics he needs to, but it doesn’t make the platform any better
Advertisers surely know he’s full of crap, too. He can make up fake views, he could even have bots click on ads, but unless he’s also going to fake being a customer it will all come out in metrics. Savvy advertisers track all of that. Clicks per display, sales per click.
Maybe misspelled “enraged”?
deleted by creator
Someone who willingly went by the name “Grimes” liked it. 🤢🤢
I’m curious about what their definition of “engaged” is. I imagine most people don’t make comments on YouTube videos, but twitter’s main focus has always been posting and commenting on others’ posts.
Scrolling by a video without even looking at it counts, apparently.
“The fact that X has made it abundantly clear that it has no desire to create a brand-safe environment has only solidified our recommendations to move to growing platforms with better opportunities for organic discovery,” he added.
This is how you say “fuck you too” in corporatespeak
I would personally go with:
“Some may say that Mr. Musk was a visionary, and further to the road map laid out by Mr. Musk during the Dealbook Summit, our organization is happy to assist with bringing said business forecast into reality.”
- Past tense on visionary
- brings up him telling companies to “fuck off”
- rubs it in that his financial people have clearly told him that this is how Xitter goes belly-up, and that when he tries to fix it, he just makes it worse.
I don’t use Twitter and my life is better off.
It’s crazy, any time I open it up I see blatantly obvious rightwing trolls or even gore. My feed pre-Elon didn’t look like that, I mostly followed infosec people but they’ve all gone elsewhere and now it seems I’m being served content that baits me into arguing or converts me.
Ten is a terrible site anyway.
Please don’t associate Xitter with the ancient Romans. They never hurt you.
They never hurt you.
This heavily depends from which geographical region you’re from. They were the champions of imperialist colonialism for a loooooong time.
Hell, I’d broaden it to the whole world because the Romans popularized Christianity, which pretty much immediately kicked off millennia of religious conflict. Christians vs “pagans” (which wasn’t one single group), Christians vs Christians, Christians vs Jews, Christians vs Muslims, Christians vs all “pagans” in the world (and their history), Catholics vs Protestants, church vs science…
Maybe Christianity would have risen without the Romans, but it wouldn’t have had such a powerful papacy without the Roman legacy. And as much as I hate religion, I have to admit it wasn’t all bad; if it weren’t for the clergy, even more Roman knowledge would have been lost and education in general through Europe would have been worse. Maybe. Islam did have Christianity beat for education and progression for a while, and the church did have a habit of condemning science that contradicted the idea that we were special in every single way.
People who seek power and authority will use whatever tools at their disposal. Christianity is a good tool because it is inherently monotheistic (leaving all the Trinitarian nonsense aside), thus making it authoritarian. One God. One mouthpiece. Christianity would have become dominant somewhere else and infected the world.
I don’t disagree, I just don’t think there would have been as strong of a central church authority because it wasn’t grandfathered in as a former Roman institution with all the power and influence that came along with that.
Once the Roman emperors decided Rome was Christian, a lot of Europe was suddenly Christian. Iberia, everything west of the Rhine, the Balkans, Anatolia, and the western part of the Middle East. If Rome hadn’t forced that, Christianity wouldn’t have spread as quickly and might even today still be one of many different sects.
Islam might have spread through Europe instead of being stopped in Iberia and the Balkans. It’s impossible to know what Europe would have done with Islam, but early Islam was a lot more tolerant of other religions and valued education, knowledge, and progress. We might not have settled in to some centuries of most people thinking humans had discovered everything there was to discover or physics being held back by people offended at the idea that the Earth isn’t the centre of existence. Colonialism might have even been different because Islam didn’t stamp out existing cultures like Christianity did (though again, who knows what it would have evolved into by the time people were figuring out how to navigate the oceans, because Rome also used to be like that).
We’re all victims of Roman jurisprudence
Great, it has now been 0 days since I thought about The Roman Empire.
What have the Romans ever done for us?
The aqueduct.
Yes, they did give us that, that’s true
And sanitation Yes, that too
The aqueduct I’ll grant is one
thing the Romans may have done
And the roads, now they’re all new
And the great wines too
Well, apart from the wines and fermentation,
And the canals for navigation
Public health for all the nation
Apart from those, which are a plus,
what have the Romans ever done for us?
Oh. Yeah, yeah. They did give us that. Uh, that’s true. Yeah.
I’m starting to think that telling your customers to “go fuck themselves” may not be a sound business decision.
So that’s why my boss won’t let me do it.
You couldn’t have posted this twenty minutes earlier? Fuck!
Elon gets what Elon deserves
But he unfortunately also gets what he doesn’t deserve, like billions of dollars
And attention. Can we finally stop talking about him? Who cares at this time.
Since when do “high quality ads” exist? I mean, the mentioning of “low quality ads” implies that those others might actually exist.
Probably meaning ads for real products and travels etc.
As a current Twitter user I would say there’s actually a large void between normal ads and whatever the hell I’m getting served on that platform these days.
Thai and Japanese TV ads are quite something else
Hell yes time for another compilation video.
loong man
Head on! Apply directly to the forehead!
JFC, talk about blast from the past. this is all I will hear for the rest of the day now.
This is the last ad that had me paying full attention when it first came on. It was ran during the football finals season and they made two cuts, one for NRL and one for AFL. https://youtu.be/gbMeKMkE_mk
Here is an alternative Piped link(s):
https://piped.video/gbMeKMkE_mk
Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.
I’m open-source; check me out at GitHub.
Here is an alternative Piped link(s):
https://piped.video/GY6uJlI-t14?si=isgeJeI1tZntpV8i
Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.
I’m open-source; check me out at GitHub.
It’s all relative.
There’s low quality ads, shit tier ads and then there’s whatever Muskyboi is attracting these days.
Those YT “in video ads” on Internet Comment Etiquette is about as high quality as you can make it. I wouldn’t want to skip Erik selling Nord VPN, Raycon, Nobleberry, or anything else he wants to make an ad for.
AI undressing apps you say? AI’s about to make that video of Elon telling advertisers to fuck off a lot more surprising.
“What’s that melting refrigerator? I thought this was an undressing app!”
“Oh, my God, that’s disgusting! Software that makes naked pics online? Where? Where did they post those?”
I mean…youtube is the same tho. I constantly get ads for apps that are basically flat out saying you can use it to make porn of anyone you want. Not to meniton the constant scams. There is that big one that pops up all the time claiming you can get a online only, no experience necessary, data entry job for Disney starting at something crazy like $25 an hour.
Musk is shit, X is shit but…all of them allow these kinds of ads.
You should just block the ads. It’s not that hard and certainly worth it.
Eh, i rarely use it on my phone so not really worth the time and effort.
It’s a couple clicks. I’d seriously recommend it because I’ve found that Google actually will improve their recommendations if you tell them stuff you’re not interested in.
Wait. That job posting is a scam?
Yep, money is too good to be true for a job like that for one thing but I saw someone talk about it and a few others like it. You go through all the steps, give them your personal information, and then you get dumped on a generic job seeking website and then get spammed to death for months.
$25 an hour is sadly not too good for any job in the US these days. $50k doesn’t go that far anymore.
Define “the US” because 25 an hour is living a life of luxury in much of the US that’s not a major city
People are still on Xitter? Gross.
Xitter is great for keeping the riff Raff contained, else they share their shit takes with the rest of the internet.
What’s that you say? Advertisers took his advice at that event seriously?
We learned in D.A.R.E. that X is bad for you. Seems like X in its digital form is also bad for you and for its dealer.
I was told to test your X to make sure it wasn’t laced with something else. Pretty sure the online X is laced with a lot of racism, transphobia, homophobia, sexism, and everything else that makes a fascist get their dick hard.
I was told X gon give it to you
Just say no
