A pirated car would just be a more free way to access the $10k/yr pay wall you live your life behind. Car-dominant infrastructure is vendor lock in.

Edit: fixed picture

  • voxel@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    you’re paying for a backend service and a constant internet connection for your car here though, not for some client side feature that can be easily unlocked

    • slacktoid
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      If i can put my own sim card in why not?

      • voxel@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago
        1. they’re not using a conventional network
        2. they still have to pay for the backend infrastructure
        3. my point is that this is not a client side feature, so it can’t be unlocked by some cpu vulnerability. This is a case in which a subscription service DOES make sense
        • slacktoid
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago
          1. Who asked them to do that?
          2. Who asked them to be the sole provider of that infrastructure? give me the server exec to host locally
          3. They designed it that way to justify this shit. I hope they all get fucked.