Hi, I was here and asked about a few distros already, so here’s a quick summary of my situation:

I’m thinking about what distro to put onto my new Laptop, which will be used for University, Work, and just general daily usage. I am currently using EndeavourOS on my main PC and have been decently satisfied, but I want to experiment more. I’ve already asked if Arch was fine for this situation, to which the answer was a general “Yes, but keep x in mind” and I’ve asked about NixOS, where the answer was generally a no.

I’ve been looking around a bit more, and now I’m kind of curious about Fedora, specifically the KDE spin (or i3, I haven’t quite decided). It seems to be cutting edge, compared to Arch’s (and by extension EndeavourOS’s) bleeding edge, and I’m wondering what you all think of it. From what I can gather it has basically all traits which people used to enjoy in Ubuntu, before Canonical dropped the ball on that. While it’s not rolling release, the stability improvements and user experience compared to something like Arch, or even a more comfortable fork like EndeavourOS, seem quite decent, but in your experience, does that make up for the lack of the AUR and reduced applicability of the Arch Wiki?

I’m curious to hear about your experiences and recommendations!

Edit: I feel like I need to clarify, I know about the difference between EndeavourOS and Arch, I mostly just brought it up as a note that I am somewhat familiar with arch-based systems, and as a question of if it’d be stupid to just go with raw Arch, as EndeavourOS is basically the same, but with a more comfortable installer. I should have specified that more clearly in the first place, my apologies.

  • BlanK0
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Fedora is indeed a pretty solid option its very stable and you are still up to date when it comes to packages.

    One distro that I personally use and I’m going to shill is void. Its bleeding edge but its surprisingly stable. If you don’t mind reading documentation and researching similarly to arch you shouldn’t have a problem (since you are accustomed to endeavourOS).

    • Falcon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      I absolutely love void. Second to that I would say endeavour, it’s just arch with zfs, a wm and an installer.

      If you’re interested in learning more try , I use oddlama’s installer. With binary packages, distrobox and flatpak, the small amount of compile time is a much smaller issue.

      Alternatively, if you’re thinking about Fedora maybe play with Silverblue, it forces you to learn a bit of containerisation which is handy

      • BlanK0
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        The oddlama installer looks interesting, I might personally check it out later 👍

      • LeFantome@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Is there an oddlama installer for Void? My least favourite thing about Void is the installer.

        When I search for oddlama, all I find is Gentoo which seems to go better with your comment.