I’m not Statesian (thank god!), but I’ve been paying some attention to Cornell West’s campaign since he announced it.

He’s not a Marxist, seems to be some kind of Christian socdem/demsoc, but I’ve noticed he’s pretty willing to denounce US imperialism, structural racism and genocidal practices. He seems to have gained some repercussion recently due to his support for Palestine, and he also has a history of cooperating with American Indigenous groups.

I know that the PSL has also announced their candidates (though tbh I haven’t heard much about them), but I want to start this discussion regarding the pragmatic decision to try and get West in one of the presidential debates.

I have no hopes of Statesians ever getting a Marxist from PSL there, but I think it’s in the realm of possibilities to have a third-party socdem to attack the DemRep duopoly for the sole purpose of building distrust from the population in both parties.

What do y’all think, does West deserve a little bit of critical support?

  • Idliketothinkimsmart@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    10 months ago

    In my view, I think reaching the masses is more effective than hoping that Cornel might or might not be allowed to debate with Biden and the like. The only way Cornel would get onto the debate stage is if he had the most votes of the 3rd parties, which does come down to votes &/ polling imo.