Thx in advice.

  • Communist
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    I don’t think you’re correct, immutability is great for long-term maintenance and makes everything, especially updating, much easier for new people.

    Non-immutable distros will often have conflicts, or when a dist upgrade happens, issues occur, immutable distros largely sidestep those issues, and I believe kinoite is the simplest, most reliable option for someone unfamiliar with performing these upgrades.

    The moment there’s a dependency issue or conflict, they will have problems.

    Fedora is not a flavor of the month project, it has just as much history as mint/ubuntu, and there’s a reason they’re shifting to atomic. Furthermore wayland is better for the vast majority of people right now, imagine you bother to switch to the linux desktop and then in a few months everything completely changes because wayland happened, it’ll look like linux is absolutely insane from the perspective of someone who hasn’t immersed themselves into the nature of this transition.

    • Fizz@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Wayland is not better for the majority of people. There is no way you can argue its less buggy than x11.

      • Communist
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        It’s less buggy for me, for sure.

        I think there’s a reason plasma decided to switch to it by default, do you have any evidence that it’s more buggy?