The only differences are that tuples are immutable and that lists have extra methods.
Is there ever a strong need for list-type data to be immutable? Evough to justify a whole extra data-type in the language?
Should they release a python 4 with it removed?
The only thing I can think of is as a default function parameter. This function is okay:
def dothings(a=(1,2)):
print(a)
a = (a[0], 3)
But this function misbehaves the second time it is called:
def dothings(a=[1,2]):
print(a)
a[1] = 3
But IMO the “mutable arguments” thing is another bug to be fixed in a hypothetical python 4. And even in python 3 you just write the function the recommended way, so there is not such a big problem.
def dothings(a=None):
if a is None:
a = [1, 2]
print(a)
a[1] = 3
The Python devs are clever guys though. There must be some really important reason to maintain both types?
Don’t really know python but i think your lists are quite performance heavy because of all the features, while tuples are closer to arrays in a language like java, and are simple memory blocks that can be worked with much faster. Don’t take my word for it though :P
This could be the right answer. I know tuples use slightly less memory. But I’m not sure if that’s so important. I don’t think programs ever need to iterate over 1 million tuple entries, where speed or memory would be important.
One important reason why tuples exist is that unlike lists they are immutable. So they are hashable and can be used as keys in dictionaries among other things.