@MarcellusDrumM to Linux • 3 years agoLinux (In)security - Article arguing that Linux isn't as secure as people claim. Thoughts?madaidans-insecurities.github.iomessage-square16arrow-up124arrow-down13 cross-posted to: hackernews@derp.foosecuritybeyondlinuxlinux
arrow-up121arrow-down1external-linkLinux (In)security - Article arguing that Linux isn't as secure as people claim. Thoughts?madaidans-insecurities.github.io@MarcellusDrumM to Linux • 3 years agomessage-square16 cross-posted to: hackernews@derp.foosecuritybeyondlinuxlinux
minus-square@federico3link3•3 years agoThis statements can be profoundly misleading when taken without context. Security is complex and multi-faceted. It needs to be understood with the proper context: what type of user are we protecting: skilled, unskilled, an entire company? An entire nation? what type of data are we protecting: a database? The user email address, browsing activity, connection metadata? what is the threat model or the attacker: a simple email scam? Surveillance from big companies? Targeted attack from a nation state? The majority of security breaches are surprisingly low-tech (phishing, guessable password…, stalkerware, built-in telemetries) Without context an article that goes “Linux being secure is a common misconception in the security and privacy realm.” can easily fuel FUD.
This statements can be profoundly misleading when taken without context.
Security is complex and multi-faceted. It needs to be understood with the proper context:
The majority of security breaches are surprisingly low-tech (phishing, guessable password…, stalkerware, built-in telemetries)
Without context an article that goes “Linux being secure is a common misconception in the security and privacy realm.” can easily fuel FUD.